Digest Number 2528 - LM potencies
Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 6:22 pm
Hi Stefano
the best reference I have come across about LM potencies is the "Hahnemann revisited" by Luc De Schepper. He has a whole chapter about it. (Chapter 6 LM Potencies).
The number of shaking is related to the sensitivity of the patient, 2 is the lowest number of shaking possible.
Your questions have a number of ramifications, so may I suggest that your read the chapter? The whole book is written so clearly and I just could not put it down!
Good luck
Lucy
hermeswins@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone know when prescribing LM potencies........does it matter if one
shake it 2 times or ten times..........which is the best to do every day and
do different methods have different effects.
Stefano in San Diego
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Visit Minutus Website at http://www.minutus.org
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, you can simply change your setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a single daily digest.
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "minutus" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
minutus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
the best reference I have come across about LM potencies is the "Hahnemann revisited" by Luc De Schepper. He has a whole chapter about it. (Chapter 6 LM Potencies).
The number of shaking is related to the sensitivity of the patient, 2 is the lowest number of shaking possible.
Your questions have a number of ramifications, so may I suggest that your read the chapter? The whole book is written so clearly and I just could not put it down!
Good luck
Lucy
hermeswins@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone know when prescribing LM potencies........does it matter if one
shake it 2 times or ten times..........which is the best to do every day and
do different methods have different effects.
Stefano in San Diego
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Visit Minutus Website at http://www.minutus.org
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, you can simply change your setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a single daily digest.
---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "minutus" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
minutus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]