Sycosis or ???
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:33 pm
Dear David and colleauges,
To summarize the discussion and to make it fruitful, I beleive that what is apparent now is that the old miasmatic categorization needs editting. David believes that the concept of Sycosis needs to be expanded and I beleive that there is no need to keep the old controversial term and better to have a fresh look at natural diseases. Both results are fine.
Of course, I believe that we should not abandon the old terms before introducing a new effective categorization system of miasms.
With all the best wishes,
Ardavan
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To summarize the discussion and to make it fruitful, I beleive that what is apparent now is that the old miasmatic categorization needs editting. David believes that the concept of Sycosis needs to be expanded and I beleive that there is no need to keep the old controversial term and better to have a fresh look at natural diseases. Both results are fine.
Of course, I believe that we should not abandon the old terms before introducing a new effective categorization system of miasms.
With all the best wishes,
Ardavan
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]