Neisserian Gonorrhea & Sycosis

[Ardavan Shahrdar]

Dear David,
I am also sure that Neisserian gonorrhea causes chronic manifestations and IS a chronic miasm. What I am saying is that common gonorrhea is not related to 'HAHNEMANN'S SYCOSIS'. What I wrote about common gonorrhea was from Hahnemann's footnote in the first page of Sycosis chapter and not what I myself believe.
Return of gonorrheal discharges after cure of patients suffering from secondary stage of chronic infection by Neisserian gonorrhea has nothing to do with Hahnemann's Sycosis. Sure, it is associated with Kent's Sycosis and Sycosis of many other homeopaths. Kent mentions Sycotic cases that he had never seen return of warts after curing those patients. It is clear why he hadn't seen warts because in most of the cases he was speaking of Sycosis, he was not reffering to Hahnemann's Sycosis (Figwarts disease). Let's not mix up the chronic miasm related to Neisserian gonorrhea and that related to condyloma acuminatum. Why using a single term for two things and sometimes for more than 2 things?!! If you wish to keep the term Sycosis, it is better to mention to whom it belongs to avoid confusions and misunderstandings.
I believe that we should edit the old miasmatic data, use all valuable experiences of pioneers and we need new terminology for such integration to avoid all those mixing ups of old times.
Warm regards,
Ardavan

---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]