Reminders of Julian Winston & PC remedies
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:34 pm
At 10:01 AM -0800 2/17/05, Dana Ullman, MPH wrote:
[snip]
Let us not confuse his background with the present.
As for Links, I personally find it one of the least interesting of
the Journals. As the practice of homeopathy seems to drift into the
worlds of speculation and away from the guidance of the basic
principles, I find LINKS to be at the forefront of the move away from
principles. The last issue contained several pieces in which the
authors were speaking in neologisms-- Scholten defining NEW words to
explain what Hahnemann stated clearly.
It all seems like a large mental wank. I read LINKS only to
understand how far homeopathy is drifting from its foundations.
JW
At 5:47 AM -0800 2/18/05, AH wrote:
AND, therefore, NOT Homeopathy!!!
Yes. It is NOT Homeopathy. Not to say that it is not useful, but by
strict definition, it is NOT homeopathy.
It is just a question of being very clear about our definitions.
Without clear boundaries you become lost in the maze.
Not necessarily. It is, again, only the need to maintain clarity
about the science.
Yes. And much of our valuable information comes from clinical
sources. But, in the past, it moves slowly and carefully. Now it
moving fast and without care.
And, if proving is not relevant, then it cannot be homeopathy!!!!! It
is SOMETHING. And whatever you want to call it is OK. But PLEASE, do
not call it what it is not!
[snip a whole bunch]
But Banerji BEGINS the process with *homeopathy*. His use of, say,
Bryonia is based on applying it according to homeopathic methodology.
Wat Banerji offers us is a way of understanding *potencies* but NOT a
way of understanding remedies-- because is approached classically.
Using homeopathy.
[sigh... snip all the rest. ]
JW
At 1:42 PM +0000 2/22/05, J Lucas wrote:
Sounds like a Nhoj Eel solution!
Indeed!
This is excellently stated. Thank you Joy!
JW
At 1:14 PM -0800 2/23/05, VR VR wrote:
Count me in.
Count me out.
Homeopathy is HOMEOPATHY. The guidelines are simple. Want to call
this new stuff something else? Fine. Just leave "homeopathy" out of
it.
And THAT is why education is needed. Until "homeopathy" has a
specific understood meaning, then the average person will continue to
not understand.
JW
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936
[snip]
Let us not confuse his background with the present.
As for Links, I personally find it one of the least interesting of
the Journals. As the practice of homeopathy seems to drift into the
worlds of speculation and away from the guidance of the basic
principles, I find LINKS to be at the forefront of the move away from
principles. The last issue contained several pieces in which the
authors were speaking in neologisms-- Scholten defining NEW words to
explain what Hahnemann stated clearly.
It all seems like a large mental wank. I read LINKS only to
understand how far homeopathy is drifting from its foundations.
JW
At 5:47 AM -0800 2/18/05, AH wrote:
AND, therefore, NOT Homeopathy!!!
Yes. It is NOT Homeopathy. Not to say that it is not useful, but by
strict definition, it is NOT homeopathy.
It is just a question of being very clear about our definitions.
Without clear boundaries you become lost in the maze.
Not necessarily. It is, again, only the need to maintain clarity
about the science.
Yes. And much of our valuable information comes from clinical
sources. But, in the past, it moves slowly and carefully. Now it
moving fast and without care.
And, if proving is not relevant, then it cannot be homeopathy!!!!! It
is SOMETHING. And whatever you want to call it is OK. But PLEASE, do
not call it what it is not!
[snip a whole bunch]
But Banerji BEGINS the process with *homeopathy*. His use of, say,
Bryonia is based on applying it according to homeopathic methodology.
Wat Banerji offers us is a way of understanding *potencies* but NOT a
way of understanding remedies-- because is approached classically.
Using homeopathy.
[sigh... snip all the rest. ]
JW
At 1:42 PM +0000 2/22/05, J Lucas wrote:
Sounds like a Nhoj Eel solution!
Indeed!
This is excellently stated. Thank you Joy!
JW
At 1:14 PM -0800 2/23/05, VR VR wrote:
Count me in.
Count me out.
Homeopathy is HOMEOPATHY. The guidelines are simple. Want to call
this new stuff something else? Fine. Just leave "homeopathy" out of
it.
And THAT is why education is needed. Until "homeopathy" has a
specific understood meaning, then the average person will continue to
not understand.
JW
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936