I have no problem with John whatsoever. John is on my permanent shun list; if I see his name as the author, I just delete it without reading it. My feelings are too precious to me for some stranger to spew his animosity at.
Roger
________________________________
To:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
From:
furryboots@icehouse.net
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 15:25:47 -0700
Subject: Re: [Minutus] BFR
Sheri,
This has NOT been about what I do. THAT is in fact the point!
I write very clearly about what I do, and you can judge it for all you are worth, I do not care - it's YOUR opinion about what I DO.
But this has been nothing to do with who does what.
It has been about John's MIS-representation about what I do.
That is a completely different matter, and defamatory at the least.
If John could stick to a fact for a minute there'd be no problem. But he doesn't know how and does not wish to know.
I have no problem with anyone's opinion of anything I actually do.
I have a HUGE problem with being misrepresented what I do as that affects my professional reputation - earned by hard work - for what I DO DO.
This matters - as people like yourself, start believing John's propaganda and untruths about me.
And other start thinking this is about a difference of opinion on homeopathy.
It is NOT.
I care noto what John's views are on homeopathy - he is entitled to hold whatever views he choses - as am I.
But we BOTh are entitled to have our views CORRECTLY represented.
NOT the opposite.
I'd prefer the truth and so should you....whether you agree with what I do or not.
I do not claim to be "Hahnemannian" whatever that means. (Don't explain, I simply do not like to "belong" to groups or religions or belief systems; I can think for myself.)
I use the principles of Homeopathy and the Law of Similars, and science, to meet aphorism one.
John is claiming I do something else. I object only to being misrepresented with untruths that deliberately undermine what I worked to be known for (whether you like that or not).
Trolls do this misrepresenting to undermine others on all kinds of lists. They tell nothing of themselves (ring a bell here?) but choose someone (it is usually a person considered knowledgeable) to misrepresent, till they are destroyed in the eyes of the list members who do not have the energy to follow the untruths (Shannon tried but John is an expert at redirecting) and start believing it is about difference of opinion - you just fell straight into that trap - as John intends.
The troll wins, and has ruined a good person's reputation exactly as intended - by misrepresenting them over and over again - till nobody knows my views and they believe what John describes.
I've had experience of the John's of the lists before - they do not vary. They do nothing else but chose someone to undermine.
Vick writes:
Vicki, if that was all this was about, I'd never bother to answer. I do not care who has what opinion.
This is about misrepresentation consistently and repeatedly and forcefully.
THAT is not anything to do with who thinks what,.
It is a purely malicious activity, and needs to be seen as such.
THAT is why I still write emails like this in response.. If I do not, I am painted here as someone I am not.
I've tried that - the troll wins if I play dead. People start writing to me that "Oh as you do such and such (troll's version) then.....fill in some abhorrent-to-me characterization of how I am incorrectly believed to be, but which is now in the public belief system.
Playing dead for trolls never worked. You are asking me to do that because it is convenient for YOU.
I'm trying to put truth back. Because it is NOT convenient for me to have my reputation messed up by John, while others soak up the untruths.
I only ask for truth.
I have no wish to influence anyone's *opinion* about the truth.
What I am seeing now - eg Sheri's email and Vicki's - is opinions about me based on UNtruths invented and misrepresented by John.
I have EVERY right to object to that. John's writing is defamatory and thus illegal (because such writing IS well known to be damaging to the victim's reputation, through untrue statements made).
Why the list manager allows that defamatory writing which is purely malicious and nothing to do with opinion, I do not understand. But clearly it is allowed here.
Therefore I WILL continue to have to waste my time that could be better spent, in protecting the TRUTH of what I do (hence my earned reputation for what I actually do and why) ....... so that you all may have whatever opinions you want about the things I do and the reasons I do them - and not about the things John CLAIMS I do and the reasons John CLAIMS I do them.
There is zero positive intention in John's claims. That is clear.
There is only positive intention in my wanting the truth instead, with whatever opinions follow about the TRUTH.
I'm sorry that you find it inconvenient for me to want truth, and thus not "shut up and go away" conveniently.
Sometimes we need to stand up and be counted for our truths.
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: > only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."