Page 8 of 10

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 3:19 am
by Shannon Nelson
I'm over my head here, so just exploring, but:
Anything will ionize if enough energy is pumped into it; enough energy to overcome the attraction between electrons and the atom or molecule. But ripping apart atoms is not generally great for living things, e.g. one of the problems with the "ionizing radiations"…

But aren't the acids and bases examples of (?in some cases organic?) molecules that are ions or do ionize, which simply means "carry a charge"? I'm exploring, not arguing. "Electron donors" and all that?

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 12:32 pm
by Irene de Villiers
Organic with covalent bonds.

The problem in this discussion is that too few folks know the difference between atoms, molecules, ions, ionic bonds, covalent bonds, elements, ionization, dissociation and chemical reactions.
These are the basic ABCs of chemistry words, and if the chemistry language with even these basics is not understood then nonsense statements get made by mistake and it leads the conversation nowhere, and to som efolks (not you!) getting frustrated and namecalling etc.

That has been happening.
(Also the bit Jon thought you wrote was somethnig I wrote)
That's the right question.
It is becasue organic molecules contain covalent bonds.
It is the bonds that count when deciding what will ionize.
ONLY an ionic bond can ionize.

Inorganic molecules are the usual source of ionic bonds, and
Organic miolecules are the usual soure of covalent bonds.

Soroush muddied the water a bit with his mention of organic acids (an exception for a special reason) as they happen to have one ionic bond among their covalent bonds, so they are organic molecules but ONE atom of theirs can actually dissociate (break off). But it does not make ions the normal way inorganic molecules do.
It is a special case. It can break off (dissociate) one H atom (H atoms generally can cause things to be acidic)
BUT instead of two ions that together make up the organbic acid, it forme two different ions that can not be joined to make the original organic molecule. so it is a special case and involves an extreme minority of chemicals, the organic acids.

With normal chemical behavior as seen in ionic bonds of inorganic molecules, their ionic bond breaks (dissociates) into two parts where rejoining them gives the SAME original molecule, There is no chemical reaction as with organic molecule dissociation of any kind.
(Chemical reaction means different end products occur from the starting ones after dissociation.)

I was trying to stick with ionic bonds of inorganic compounds. THese ionic bonds break apart (dissociate) into two parts that ALWAYS mke the same molecule when the two ions so formed, are put back together.
Example NaCl (sodium chloride or salt or nat mur) breaks apart (dissociates) into the ions of Na+ and Cl-
when you put Na+ and Cl- back togetehr they are NaCl.
With the odd case of organic acids, they are complex organic molecules with an H stuck on somewhere by ionic bond, to make them an acid. Most organic molecules have no ionic bonds, only covalent bonds that do not come apart when they are dissolved.
SO an organic acid can dissociate its H that is joined by ionic bond (but notr the rest of the multiple atoms in it, and that has to steal an H2O to work, and make H3O+ ion and an acid that lacks ONE H atom.
If you add those ions back together, you will get a different chemical than the original organic acid, as there is an extra O and two extra H's involved. That is becasue this is not true ioization as in organic chemicals but an actual chemical reaction rather than ionization. Only the fact hat the two resultant entities have a charrfge, allows them to be called i ons. But they have lost the integrity of being the same substance ionized or non-ionized, as occurs in inorganic molecules.
In homeopathy this matters, as in infinite filution, the nature of the chemical such as NaCL or Na+ Cl- is the SAME.

Now we know separately, that at infinite dilution, the nature and characteristics of the starting substance (whether inoprganic like NaCl, or organic which disolves but does not dissociate any atoms) are all present at infinite dilution.
How they maintain that integrity was the (suposed) subject of discussion and Jon said the integroty has to do with ions liek Na+ and Cl+.
But organic molecules do not dissociate any atoms (except a few exceptios like organic acids) no matter hw muc you dilute them, so one can not make a rule about what happens in the dilution to the atoms, to ensuree their character is there regardless of dilution, that uses a mechanism that ONLY applies to a few inorganic chemicals.
Joh also proposes that ionization somehow makes a LOT of particles from one, and calls it plasma, but that is not true either. At best two ions form from one molecule, no more. so they will soon be theoretically missing from an infinitely diluted solution.

I contend that any dissociation of inorganic molecules into ions is just a red herring in the discussion.
It can have nothing to do with HOW the molecules retain their characteristic behavior at infinite dilution.
We know they do.
Whatever mechanism allows the starting substance to retain characteristics after infinite dilution, has to be a mechanism that applies to ALL substances used in homepathy. (I do not believe there are different mechanisms for different types of molecules as would have to be the case if ionic or covalent bonds were relevant to any of them in any way.)
A covalent bond in ANY molecule, can not ionize.
It might be forced to dissociate if enough energy was supplied to force it - but the split is not into ions and only with a chemical change into one or more new substances.

Ions only form readily where their structure is such that they are h aooier apart than together.
(Every atom has a specific structureinvolving positive charges in the ucleus, and electrons moving around it in specific groups that like to be "full" groups.
If an atom has a single electron where it is happier with two, (they are all happier with paired electrons) it will very readily do chemical changes.
That is a simplification and what reactions an element (a basic substance that cannot be divided into smaller ones)
can do, is determined by its positio in the periodic table of elements.

So for example all the elements in a row will behave similarly (like fluoride, chloride, bromide for exampe) becasu they share similar electron configurations.
SO the position on the table predicts what elements will behave how with other elements.

No, here someone lacks the understanding of the langage.
ONLY specific elements can behave as ions.
Anythig will dissociate (split apart but not necessarily into ions), if enough energy is added.
Covalent bond dissociation is always a chemical reaction making new compounds NOT ions.
Ionic bonds can make ions when they dissociate but only inorganic molecules make ions that rejoin as the original substanbce and not a new chemical.
No this is a totally different area of chemistry, separate from any bonding and splitting of bonds as in chemical reactions and dissociations.
Chemical reactions are about bonds and making and breaking bonds. That is regular chemistry, using elements on the periodic table.

Atomic chemistry is about individual elements and radioactive forms of them and how to mess with the proton and electron structiure inside an individual atom, which can actually change an element into two other elements plus a whole bunch iof radioactive particle fling about., THINK FUKUSHIMA.
No. molecules are not ions and ions are not molecules.
Organic acids are regular organic molecules with one H atom plunked on somewhere with an ionic bond to join it.
The BOND determines what it can do or not do. All the covalent bonds in the orgaic acid are stuck that way. It is ccomplex and haas only ONE atom of H to mess with to make new ions.

Molecles are never ions. Again the "language of chemistry" issue arises.
Molecules are groups of atoms joined by bonds.
An ion is a section of a molecule that has split/dissociated into two parts IN SOLUTION, called ions, one part with + charge and one part with - charge. Ions only exist in solution.
Think of inorganic molecules in solution as a couple dancing without touching, they are ions.
Think of a organic molecule in solution as a couple dancing while holding onto each other, no ions.
Not like that.
Many molecules have charges, any number of charges.
Other molecules are totally neutral, no charges anywhere.
A molecule with charges is a POLAR molecule. (sorry but more vocabulary needed)
A polar molecule can be organic or inorganic. The charges are usually in areas of the molecules that have bonds involving H (like to be H+) or OH (likes ot be OH-) or NH (likes to be +)
SO if there are bonded H, O or NH (eg NH3) and some other chemical "groups" the area of the molecle with that grop will tend to be polarized (think magnet) towards the preferred charge of the GROUP. The entire molecule will always be neutral. So maybe a molecule will have two H+ areas and two OH- areas.The molecule in intact, nothig is split off or dissociated, it is just "polarized"

IF the molecule HAPPENS to be an electrolyte sucvh as NaCL then in solution it will dissociate into ions,
An organic polarized molecule will not dissociate. But in water, if it has negative areas, they will try to get n ear H areas of water wich are polarized + there. And any polarized negative parts of an organic molecule will try to be near the O-- of water wich has two negative charges there.
Water acts like an organic molecule. It does not dissociate, but is polarized, with two _ charges in the O area and one + charge in each H area.
Electron donors apply to chemical reactions, not to ions.
Ions have the charges present in the molecule, no extra ones.

Electrons are "donated" in chemical reactions, not in ioninzation where the starting charegs are the same and in the same places, as the ending ones.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.Furryboots.info
(Info on Feline health, genetics, nutrition & homeopathy)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:19 pm
by Irene de Villiers
Sigh!
Stop calling me wrong and learn the alphabet first.

I sure wish you knew your chemical alphabet.

WHat you are calling abiliuty to ionize is NOT what you are looking at in the periodic table.
All they are telling you is how much energy it takes to remove one electron from one ATOM of an ELEMENT.
You are onfusing that with ionization of an INORGANIC MOLECULE into componenet ions.

The one is ionization of an element.
The other is ionization of a molecule.

It wodul really help if you knew the difference between atoms, elements, molecules, ions, bonds, electrolytes, acids, inoranic and organic molecules, inorganic and organic bonds, and between ionization of molecules versus elements, and dissociation of bonds versus ions, etc.
i.e. The basic alphabet in chemistry.

Your rudeness usually occurs after you mistake one basic concept for another, or else yo look up a definitioin or table that you do not understand but see a word that is in new context and assum eit is what yo want, leaving out any other words that are inconvenient to you in any definition.

Then you are rude to anyone who has not got the same wild imagination of inappropriately misapplied terms.

Next time yo see a word you THINK yo know, look up the definition of the way it is used where you found it.

For example here you found the phrase "ionization energy"
You needed to ask yourself, ionization of what?
Where is the definition?

Had you bothered to do that you would have found this to b e the energy required to remove one electron from the ELEMENT in question.
There are no ionic bonded inorganic molecles to ionize.

It is nothing to do with making ions in solution from inorganic molecules at normal temp and pressure, wich as I said is NOT possible with diamonds or silica..

It has nothing to do with formation of ions in solution.
In addition, the homepathic remedies we make are not forced reactions with huge energy to force them.
They occur at normal temperatures and pressures and you need to seek ionization by DISSOCIATION of TWO or more DIFFERENT atoms of a MOLECULE (There are no polarized silica or diamond molecules as you would need for ionic dissociation).

Stop calling me wrong. It is rude. This is about WHAT - not whom - the correct story is about.
I do not talk through the top of my head, a fact yhou should know by now. I speak when I know what I am talking about. Wish you would do that.
but till you learn or wish to do so, at least quit being rudely personal to me, and learn the language of cemistr enough to kow what yo are referring to - ot else ask for information to understand better, instead of assuming wild conclusions that are not even in the ballpark.

If you would bother to learn some chemistry alphabet, like what constitutes an atom, an element, an electron, an ion, a molecule, an inorganic molecule, an organic mlecule, a bond, an ionic bond, a cobalent bond, dissociation, ionization of a molecule v ersus an element, dissociatio of a bond versus an ionic molecule, etc,BEFORE you toss out rudeness with your wild claims, that would help!

In this case you are confusing ionization (removal of an electron) of an element by force, with dissociation into ions of an ionnic bonded molecule in solution.
They have NOTHING in common.

The rest below I delete, it is more wild rambling with no roots in fact.
try again when y o learn the terms.
meantime..
Leave out my name. I am NOT a topic for you to discuss.
And maybe you shoud know enough English to know it does?

The female half (of the species called "man"), are busy "doing it", and we work at using the correct terms for the language being spoken.

Namaste,
Irene

--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.Furryboots.info
(Info on Feline health, genetics, nutrition & homeopathy)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:24 pm
by Irene de Villiers
Not Shannon. Those were my words.
No, only your invented misapplication of them.

Irene

--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.Furryboots.info
(Info on Feline health, genetics, nutrition & homeopathy)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:43 pm
by Soroush Ebrahimi
Dear Irene
I mentioned that proteins had N-H bonds similar to that of ammonia - which would form ions in solution.

You seem not to have commented on this point!
Rgds

Soroush

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:00 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Hi Irene,

The point I was raising in this snippet, was in response to this of John's:
So I was meaning to say that yes, it will ionize *if a high energy energy is applied* -- enough to rip electrons out of even e.g. a silica molecule's strong grip. So when we say this or does doesn't ionize, it's with the assumption that we're talking about "under normal conditions." So I was point out that pointing out that there is a level of energy input at which it *will* ionize doesn't speak to the questions at hand. Nothing to do with the main body of the discussion...

Shannon

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:23 pm
by John R. Benneth
In a message dated 6/23/2015 4:19:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
Chemical alphabet? When did you invent that?
Oh, thank you, I think I got it figured out now: There's chemistry, where you look things up in black and white, and then there's Irene, where you have to ask her what the hell she's talking about. First Irene says elements like carbon and silica don't ionize, then she admits they do when she admits the ionization energy index on the periodic table "is how much energy it takes to remove one electron from one ATOM of an ELEMENT."
What do you mean? I thought the cavil of the day was that the carbon in an ORGANIC molecule couldn't dissociate . .
So what? Let's try to keep this in context, Irene. What you're selling here, for anyone who wants it, is a hall pass on the irrelevance of standard chemistry's principle of perpetual dissociation in infinite dilution. Have I got that right? Maybe you could start over by explaining that.
I for one think its remarkable that the entire sorority here and elsewhere in 106 years of homeopathy geniuses have had NOTHING to say about orthodox chemistry's recognition of "infinite dilution," the properties of the solute remaining in constant concentration.
WHY IS THAT?
How do you explain THIS:
According to the FDA's Copeland, ionization in molecular dilution is theoretically complete by the sixth decimal dilution (6X). Hydrolysis splits solute particles into infinitely smaller pieces . . a concept known by orthodox chemistry as the law of infinite dilution, which states

"In the limiting case of c→0 (concentration approaching zero), the ion concentration never reaches zero, but it does keep getting close. You can never dilute a solution containing a solute to zero concentration (i.e. pure solvent)."

http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ques ... onductance

The second amazing scientific fact that chemically supports homeopathy, is that is that no matter how much solvent is added to the solution, the chemical properties of the solute remain!
Clarke: ''Dr. William P. Wesselhœft, in a paper published in theJournal of Homœopathics of September 1898, tells how Nageli demonstrated the presence of an active copper force, which he termed Oligodynamis, in solutions ranging from one in 100,000,000 to one in 1,000,000,000. Nageli showed that when once a glass vessel has been "infected" with "oligodynamic water" it is almost impossible to get rid of the force by simply diluting it. "He distilled one litre of water in glass retorts, suspended four clean copper coins in this water during four days, and found that this solution killed his Spirogyra plants in a very few minutes. When this water was poured away, the glass rinsed and washed carefully, and again refilled with neutral water, the Spirogyra also died in a very short time. If, however, the glass was washed out with diluted nitric acid, and refilled with fresh neutral water, the plants flourished and remained healthy. This proved conclusively that acopper force was imparted to water from the walls of the glass vessel. Rinsing, washing, brushing and even boiling had little effect upon the glass ; not until a mineral acid had been used did the glass vessel lose its oligodynamic properties. Again, he found that this oligodynamic water poured into a new, clean glass vessel transferred its poisonous properties to the walls of the glass, and this, in turn, was again able to medicate neutral distilled water. He says :- 'Glasses with oligodynamic after-effects (nachwirkung), lose their power very slowly after being repeatedly refilled with neutral water, which is allowed into stand in them for a while, and somewhat more rapidly if they are boiled in neutral water.' " This refers to the direct action of the copper force on small vegetable organisms. But the human organism is infinitely more sensitive ; and experience has shown that when dilution has been carried beyond the point of direct poisoning power, a health-restoring dynamics remains in undiminished force, which the homœopathic law enables us with certainly to direct.' from the chapter 'The Power of Infinitesimals Recognised by Non-Homœopathic Authorities' in Homeopathy Explained by John Henry Clarke, M.D. http://www.homeoint.org/books5/clarkehomeo/power.htm
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:32 pm
by Irene de Villiers
Sorry Soroush, I do not remember that specifically!
I remember your bringing up organic acids. (I may have missed a post?)

However I did mention that some proteins have ionic bonds hidden among their structure and also that N-H (and -H) bonds in organic compounds are ionic bonds.

I was trying NOT to mention the exceptions among organic chemicals that have the odd ionic bond. It seemed confusing enough to people who do not know an atom from a molecule or element, not to further confuse with the exception cases where organic compounds have the occasional ionic bond.
The general case is where organic molecules have covalent bonds - and they do not dissociate into ions. For me that is relevant enough to show that a theory involing ionic bond dissociations can not be the case for all substances ..... as any theory must cover all cases for homepathically used substances.

It does not seem that too many list members had any chemistry study to speak of, not even basics :-(
That makes the discussion much more awkward. Kinda like using a language nobody learned.

Namaste,
Irene

--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.Furryboots.info
(Info on Feline health, genetics, nutrition & homeopathy)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:33 pm
by Soroush Ebrahimi
Dear John
Would you like to revise or explain this sentence:

" recognition of "infinite dilution," the properties of the solute remaining in constant concentration."

If you keep diluting, the concentration of WHAT remains constant pls?

Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 23 June 2015 16:24
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED
In a message dated 6/23/2015 4:19:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
Chemical alphabet? When did you invent that?
Oh, thank you, I think I got it figured out now: There's chemistry, where you look things up in black and white, and then there's Irene, where you have to ask her what the hell she's talking about. First Irene says elements like carbon and silica don't ionize, then she admits they do when she admits the ionization energy index on the periodic table "is how much energy it takes to remove one electron from one ATOM of an ELEMENT."
What do you mean? I thought the cavil of the day was that the carbon in an ORGANIC molecule couldn't dissociate . .
So what? Let's try to keep this in context, Irene. What you're selling here, for anyone who wants it, is a hall pass on the irrelevance of standard chemistry's principle of perpetual dissociation in infinite dilution. Have I got that right? Maybe you could start over by explaining that.

I for one think its remarkable that the entire sorority here and elsewhere in 106 years of homeopathy geniuses have had NOTHING to say about orthodox chemistry's recognition of "infinite dilution," the properties of the solute remaining in constant concentration.

WHY IS THAT?
How do you explain THIS:
According to the FDA's Copeland, ionization in molecular dilution is theoretically complete by the sixth decimal dilution (6X). Hydrolysis splits solute particles into infinitely smaller pieces . . a concept known by orthodox chemistry as the law of infinite dilution, which states

"In the limiting case of c→0 (concentration approaching zero), the ion concentration never reaches zero, but it does keep getting close. You can never dilute a solution containing a solute to zero concentration (i.e. pure solvent)."

http://chemistry.stackexchange.com/ques ... onductance

The second amazing scientific fact that chemically supports homeopathy, is that is that no matter how much solvent is added to the solution, the chemical properties of the solute remain!
Clarke: ''Dr. William P. Wesselhœft, in a paper published in theJournal of Homœopathics of September 1898, tells how Nageli demonstrated the presence of an active copper force, which he termed Oligodynamis, in solutions ranging from one in 100,000,000 to one in 1,000,000,000. Nageli showed that when once a glass vessel has been "infected" with "oligodynamic water" it is almost impossible to get rid of the force by simply diluting it. "He distilled one litre of water in glass retorts, suspended four clean copper coins in this water during four days, and found that this solution killed his Spirogyra plants in a very few minutes. When this water was poured away, the glass rinsed and washed carefully, and again refilled with neutral water, the Spirogyra also died in a very short time. If, however, the glass was washed out with diluted nitric acid, and refilled with fresh neutral water, the plants flourished and remained healthy. This proved conclusively that acopper force was imparted to water from the walls of the glass vessel. Rinsing, washing, brushing and even boiling had little effect upon the glass ; not until a mineral acid had been used did the glass vessel lose its oligodynamic properties. Again, he found that this oligodynamic water poured into a new, clean glass vessel transferred its poisonous properties to the walls of the glass, and this, in turn, was again able to medicate neutral distilled water. He says :- 'Glasses with oligodynamic after-effects (nachwirkung), lose their power very slowly after being repeatedly refilled with neutral water, which is allowed into stand in them for a while, and somewhat more rapidly if they are boiled in neutral water.' " This refers to the direct action of the copper force on small vegetable organisms. But the human organism is infinitely more sensitive ; and experience has shown that when dilution has been carried beyond the point of direct poisoning power, a health-restoring dynamics remains in undiminished force, which the homœopathic law enables us with certainly to direct.' from the chapter 'The Power of Infinitesimals Recognised by Non-Homœopathic Authorities' in Homeopathy Explained by John Henry Clarke, M.D. http://www.homeoint.org/books5/clarkehomeo/power.htm
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)

Re: SECRET CHEMISTRY OF HOMEOPATHY EXPOSED

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:36 pm
by John R. Benneth
In a message dated 6/23/2015 4:19:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
IRENE WRITES:
How about if instead of saying "WRONG, Irene," I say "On the contrary, Ms. de Villiers"?
ROY: "There is no doubt that under the “normal” succussing procedures, very respectable pressures (say in the 10 kbar range) can be generated on the different size water droplets which result from the
shaking."

John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)