Are you suggesting that any human is "perfect"?
Or that it is impossible to make further progress after a great mind sets the wheels in motion?
It's a bit like saying the perfect wheel is a circle and no other shape will give smooth motion.
But it turns out that's NOT true. Several shapes will give smooth motion, and if you add suspension it feels even better.
(Check out Skateboard Shark wheels which are cubic and other non-circular options that use a sine wave such as here:
http://typnet.net/Articles/NonCircularWheel.pdf)
Does that make the first wheel "perfect"?
It was likely perfect *for its time*.
Two hundred years later, it is possible to see things in new light with new inputs.
Hahnemann was NOT satisfied that LMs were perfect anyway - he experimented with potencies to the end of his days - not someone anyone does if they think they have a perfect system:-)
I too do not use LMS. I read about them, and tried them, but got frustrated by some deaths that resulted, which I felt should be winnable cases. I found that in the kind of cases I was working with, C potencies were too rough (aggravations occurred regardless of dosing adjustments) and LMs were too slow at getting progress or not "kick in the pants" enough, and the disease outstripped them. It was a no-win situation, and C's were better than LMs. Not many cases are/were that critical but that is the area I happen work in.
Progress comes well with Fibonacci series. These are still C potencies - but you need not go so high to get results, so the aggravations are less, and the results are more....it's gentler, and stronger. That's what I needed.
Try Fibonacci potencies for a MAJOR upgrade in gentle and more effective case results.
I doubt anyone using them will even go back to another potency again. Especially if you work with the kind of cases that are critical, and on the edge of death to start with.
Before LMs, I needed to go progressively higher to as high as 50M daily doses (quite a scary potency I thought - but it was needed) to get healing of a fast cancer in a dog.
Since changing to Fibonacci potencies I have not needed higher than 377C, and that was one case - all others needed 233C or less since I started using F series in 2009.
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."