Page 4 of 6
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:40 am
by Irene de Villiers
It - periodic tables - not necessary.........
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.Furryboots.info
(Info on Feline health, genetics, nutrition & homeopathy)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:12 pm
by Bob Needham
Right ON Irene
Bob
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:41 pm
by Bob Needham
Bob Needham
H.BSc. D.H.M. Fellow
For every progressive spirit
there will always be a thousand
mediocre minds to guard the past.
Absolutely Tanya - for me it's all about the energy connection
bob
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:54 pm
by Tanya Marquette
OMG—it came out exactly opposite of what I was trying to say.
Funny thing with this computer is that it literally changes my words. I must have had a type that the
computer corrected its own way.
Thanx for catching that!
t
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:55 pm
by Bob Needham
Apologies - I didn't want all that other stuff as a precursor to my comment - heinous miserable computer
world
8>-)
bob
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:00 pm
by Bob Needham
HEY Looks like were on the same wavelength here too
Bob
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 1:05 pm
by Tanya Marquette
I attended a 3 day workshop in Boston years ago when Scholten was presenting his system and cases.
It was fascinating and it made a lot of sense. It enabled him to understand elements that have not been proven yet
and he presented several cases solved by applying the logic of the table to the elements. That is the part that has
made some homeopaths critical.
Sankaran used the same logic in trying to explore plant and animal remedies, trying to see the changing dynamic
in species so that they could be charted with some kind of order for homeoathic uses.
Since everything has energy it makes sense to try and understand whether there are energy patterns that can be
put into an orderly system.
t
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 9:50 pm
by Ginny Wilken
She meant "(the study of the periodic table) isn't necessary (in order) to learn the principles....
ginny
--
Ginny Wilken
gwilken@fastmail.fm
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 9:50 pm
by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
I went to Scholten and Sankaran classes, then to practical workshops by some of their earliest students.
Made a lot of sense and paper cases were easy to solve....then back in the clinic....zilch....in short, way too much subjective assessments, I was totally unable to use it in real life because of that.
But, and that is important, when I check a remedy in their MMs, it has never let me down, so I use those MMs a lot....and that is why I am going to attend Scholten's 3 days seminars on plants...
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz
Re: New member
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:02 pm
by Shannon Nelson
There was also another -- can't remember name or author, I'm afraid! -- where the writer made comparison between what was predicted by Scholten's method, with what had been found for those mineral remedies that *are* known in practice, and the correspondence was very reassuring. Does anyone remember that book?
There will always be things that come out in practice, that were not evident from the theory; theoretical frameworks certainly can't *replace* experiential ones -- and certainly experience trumps theory. But, as happened with chemistry's periodic table, a little theory can be a useful guide in guiding experience. I'm a fan.
Shannon