First, please remember that the NY Times is a nwo lackey and is
completely in the corner for globalism. There is seldom anything that
they print that is not slanted in that direction and there is in fact,
a quote from David Rockefeller thanking the NY Times for their
reporting (which held back the truth) and without which the nwo could
not have achieved the results that they had at the time as they were
then closing in on near world conquest. You can look that up if you
wish. Even when they report the truth, they usually use words in such
a way that the person they are reporting on is cast in a negative
light (if he is not liberal).
To understand this article, one must have a basic understanding of
economics, statistics, and government reporting of facts and figures.
The unemployment rate for instance, rose steadily throughout obama's 8
years even using the government's numbers and then it reversed and it
appeared that the rate was falling which would mean that more people
had started to find jobs. What actually was happening was that after a
certain number of months which may or may not be around 24 - I can't
remember but one can look it up - the government stops reporting those
people as unemployed and they are assumed to have found a job and are
removed from the unemployment rolls even though they haven't. Thus,
the government gets credit for job creation when in reality, nothing
has changed. The unemployment situation remained bad for virtually
obama's entire 2 terms but after X number of months it appeared that
jobs were starting to come in owing to the above methods of reporting.
They were not. And whatever jobs were being created were service
sector jobs - low paying work at McDonalds; or whatever. No one could
support a family in those jobs so the rate of participation in
government food stamps rose to its greatest level in history and has
now begun to drop slowly under Trump. The quote from the article
(which follows below) explains the work force rate a little bit by
referencing those who "dropped out of the work force" and the "labor
force participation rate". I do not have his 8 years of economic
statistics committed to memory but I have a general remembrance of
what went on. Also, as I owned a large number of rental units, I was
in a situation where I would lose tenants from time to time because so
many could not find work under obama. So many younger people (who were
my primary rental market) returned to live with their parents that the
rental market became very soft for a while and there was a lot of
units on the market. Because my units were well maintained, I did not
suffer too much but I know those who did because their units were not
quite so kept up.
Quote number 1:
"One possibility is that the number of workers who dropped out of the
work force after the recession is bigger than first thought. The labor
force participation rate fell sharply during and after the recession
and stands at 62.9 percent, little changed from when Mr. Trump took
office."
Remember that businesses began to announce that they were going to
stay or relocate to the US even before Trump took office because he
made it a point to tell everyone how the business climate was going to
change.
Dozens of small businesses went under during obama's years and that is
when the term "retail apocalypse" began to be widely used to describe
business conditions. obama was put into office by the CIA to destroy
the economy and he did a very good job of it. Had he another term or
should Hellary have been elected, the job would now be complete and we
would be at war with Russia, China, and Iran.
Quote number 2:
"Gross domestic product is a primary indicator of a country’s economic
health. On July 28, the Commerce Department reported the economy had
expanded at an annual rate of 2.6 percent in the second quarter, “an
unbelievable number,” according to Mr. Trump.
But that came after a sluggish 1.2 percent rate in the first quarter;
and as recently as the spring, many economists expected the rebound
would be much stronger, with second-quarter growth topping 3.5
percent."
The above quote demonstrates how the NYT pretends to report the facts
but at the same time cons the reader into believing that Donald Trump
actually underperformed where he should have been.
The first quarter GDP figure was 1.2% which is horrible. That figure
reflects economic activity from the previous administration. You may
recall that last year, Christmas sales tanked, numerous retailers went
bankrupt including Sears, and the wounded economy just limped along to
the point where it was almost dead. Trump took office in late January
and cannot be expected to get things turned around before he had even
unpacked his bags. Remember how he had to fight off calls for his
impeachment and a Congress which refused to approve his cabinet
appointees. He was also attacked relentlessly by obama, an ex
president, in actions which were unprecedented in American history.
Trump's first GDP was the second quarter and that was at a revised
annualized rate of 3.1%. Obama never made it to an annual rate of 3%
although there were quarterly GDP's that reached that figure.
http://fortune.com/2017/08/30/donald-tr ... -mo-3-gdp/ The
manner of reporting GDP was changed by him during obama's years and
that worked to his advantage in that certain things were counted that
had never been counted before. I do not have time to look for the
article on that but one can find it by searching for it using Good
Gopher or another uncensored search engine. Trump's 3rd quarter GDP
was at 3% and came during a quarter when the US was hit by 2 giant
hurricanes created by the globalists using HAARP technology. The
globalists' aim was to destroy oil production capacity in the US and
cause a recession and they almost succeeded. Despite the opposition
Trump must face, US GDP is responding to his efforts and is expected
to hit 3.3% next quarter. More importantly, the American people are
seeing through all the lies and the deep state interference and are
responding to the things he is doing. Here is an article which
explains the effect that Trump has had on consumer confidence which is
rising very rapidly to its highest point in 17 years.
https://nypost.com/2017/11/04/wage-grow ... americans/
Quote number 3 "It should come as no surprise that consumer confidence
is skyrocketing, hitting 125.9 in October — that’s the highest level
since December 2000."
True wages are up for US workers and continue to grow as the jobs
being added are real jobs and not service sector jobs.
Quote number 4:
"n the third quarter, wages grew 0.7 percent, up from 0.5 percent in
the second quarter. Wage growth, which is the byproduct of corporate
profit growth and tighter employment, is finally making its way to the
paycheck. But there’s plenty of catch-up needed to make up for the
unprosperous past eight years." (of obama)
People often do not know these things because they do not want to know
them. They have been trained like Pavlov's dogs to salivate and go
into hysterics when they hear Trump's name. So many say they hate him
but when asked to explain why can only offer that he is a racist and
misogynist but cannot offer any real examples to prove those
statements. I ask anyone reading this now to provide one real example
of Trump doing anything that will prove those statements.
It is truly time to wake up. Those who know history can see that what
happened in Germany and in Russia in 1917 and afterward is happening
in the US and that our nation has almost fallen. We need people to be
clearheaded and educated, not weepy, dishonest, and hysterical. You
have been given the truth many times but so far only a few have
responded. You are invited to the awakening but whether you come or
not is up to you.
On 11/29/17, Shannon Nelson
shannonecn135@gmail.com [minutus]
wrote: