hahnemannian2002 wrote:
Do you really think it is an either-or situation?
My belief is that both are relevant and act at teh same tiome.
To me this is why some conventional vaccinations "workl". In my opinion
any effectivenes of a vaccine is due to tyhe homeopathic actio of the
vaccine and NOT the antiobpdyu-producing aspect (despite what allopathy
says).
This to me would explain why for example a TB vaccine does cause TB
antibodies to be formed but does NOT confer ANY immunity to TB. It also
explains why a TB vaccine confers some resistance to leprosy. (They are
similar organisms - so the homeoprphylaxis principle is at work here,
NOT an anti-body "immune response".)
Likewise it explains why "smallpox vaccine" which is actually made
from cowpox", is one that "works".
It is not in my opinion the antibodies from the vaccine that "work" or
have anything to do with resistance (which allopaths incorrectly call
immunity) - it is the homeopathic effect of the cowpox being similar to
smallpox and causing homeoprophylaxis homeopathically - that is why
cowpox vaccination builds resistance to smallpox.
Antibodies are a separate issue - a dangerous one.
YEs exposure causes them to be formed - but whenm a vaccine does it the
body's response is overwhelmed causing massive TH-2 cytokine response
and skewwing.
In natural disease, the disease also induces antibodeis to be formed -
but not in a way to overwhel;m the TH-1 cytokine system - and in fact in
natural disease the TH-1 cytokines are enhanced and the TH-2 remains as
before. Tehre is no skewing to Th-2-damaged immune system.
To my way of thinking, the antibodies are a bit useless in terms of
resistance or "immunity" simply because of how the immune system functions.
When a foreign organism lands on/in the body - it is the TH-1 cytokine
response that is supposed to be triggered and that WILL be triggered (if
it has not been destrioyed by vaccines and drugs) to get rid of the
invader where it lands. NO disease will then occur. That is true
resistance to disease.
If however the Th-1 response is damaged such as by vaccines, pred,
soy, etc - then the Th-1 system such as it is, will be overwhelmed and
the cytokine feedback loops will "tell" the Th-2 guys that there is a
war on and that HUGE response is required - so Th-2 goes to war. Tehr
esult is allergies and immune compromise diseases, as there is no
overwhelming onslaught to fight - it's a mistake beause the TH-1
response is too damaged to work.
However in cases where TH-2 response is needed - and IF antibodies are
there - THEN the antibodies will go to work AFTER the Th-1 system failed
AND disease got started AND feedback went to Th-2 system for just such
antibody backup forces.
There has to be established disease before Th-2 system can even
recognize a need for the antibodies it has in the store.
In my book, allowing a problems to arrive in the body *unchallenged* and
to let them establish disease - and then only getting the TH-2 antibody
response triggered to chemically fight the disease - is not "immunity".
It is just back-up chemical ammunition storage for if a disease reaches
a certain stage.
Immunity IMO comes at an energetic level - as we know from homeopathy
and homeoprophylaxis. It's not to do with chemical level antibodies in a
back-up system that is over-expressed due to severe damage of the
primary system that is supposed to keep bugs at bay.
Hence in your initial sentence above, when you separate action as
physiological at low potency and suggest it is energetic at high - I
question that. I think there is an energy action at both potencies, and
depending on the life force and need of the client/animal - the low
potency will show energetic and/or physiological effects depending which
are stringer and which have more susceptibility - where the high potency
will only show energetic effect, the physiological one having been
diluted out.
I thought sarcodes were by definition healthy tissue - and then that
excludes any hormones. Hormones are not tissues.
Pred is not a sarcode at any potency being made from a hormone - but
Thymus 4C is being made from pieces of the tissue of a thymus gland.
Likewise Thyroid 4C is a sarcode but no thyroid hormone is one.
Hormones are - not tissues.
Only the hormones - not the tissues of sarcodes - are governed by
feedback loops (in MANY cases, not all). And the hormones can be out of
whack for many reasons, including tumours - and no feedback will fix that!
Thyroid 4C has no hormones. It is the healthy TISSUE of the gland - not
the hormones produced by it. (There are remedies from thyroid hormones
as well but they are not sarcodes.)
No. The sarcode has to do with having a healthy gland that therefore
produces the right hormones - it has nothing to do with the actual
hormones. If there is hypothyroid - the sarcode is not there to change
the hormone production but to change the thyroid gland to be healthier.
That may LEAD to an improved hormone situation (hopefully) but it is not
a hormone remedy.
Similarly a blood vessel sarcode is to help build better blood vessel
tissue - all sarcodes are tissue remedies.
A misunderstanding....
Tissues have no physiological action.
NAmaste,
IRene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."