Page 4 of 4

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:06 am
by muthu kumar
OK ,sorry that it upset you so much..lumping Rajan's methods and
combinations...

I agree I was wrong to do that, combinations are much more useful
:)

( Just kidding- please do not hypertense)
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Brian Garnant wrote:
Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no
representations regarding the individual suitability of the
information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation
offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any
purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the
recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual
members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special,
punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
change your setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to
receive a single daily digest.

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:07 am
by Simon King LCPH MARH
arr arr

;-)

kind regards

Simon King
44 (0)1603 466092
(include the zero in brackets only if calling from the UK)
http://www.Homeopathy-Help.net
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:19 am
by Simon King LCPH MARH
not too disturbing, just tedious, and as I said hypocritical, but
more than that it has been illustrated yet again in these recent
discussions how the list is incapable of being civil i.e. personal
comments creep in.

At least lygtforce list (TOL to some) was open in its vitriol and
entertaining for it;-)

kind regards

Simon King
44 (0)1603 466092
(include the zero in brackets only if calling from the UK)
http://www.Homeopathy-Help.net
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 6:51 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Didn't Nhoj also prove Owl's Milk? Or was that somebody else's?
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:16 pm
by Penelope
Nhoj Eel was not responsible for the Owls Milk proving- I dont know
who was. He did 'prove' Bamboo(alternative version) along with
Rubber and Leather and a few other strange things.
Regards
John
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Robert & Shannon Nelson
wrote:
Nhoj Eel
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/homeopathy ... ERA_MEDICA
/
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/homeopathy ... ERA_MEDICA
/

Re: Classical homoeopathy, complexes and list rules

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:25 am
by Gaby Rottler
Dear Chris,

I've been away for a couple of days (meeting a descendant of Grauvogl,
BTW) - and the discussion here on the list moved from the combos to
Scholton, Sankaran and others - ,and due to lack of time (busy writing
my book) don't read all the posts on Minutus. Posts coming from email
lists I usually check which ones contain my name, and these are
answered.
You're welcome!
Yes, exactly.
Homoeopaths like Edouard Broussalian and others really deserve our
respect.
Just a little more historical background to the topic of mixing several
remedies in potency:

Even Aegidi recommended the use ONLY in cases where he could not find
ONE remedy to cover a case,two remedies seemed to be similar to the
case, without an existing antidotary relationship. Lutze (who is often
quoted as being one of the father of complexes) warned against mixing
remedies which were not similar to a case. When giving 2 remedies
together, both of them covered several aspects of a chronic case, and -
what is important: he recommended waiting several MONTHS after giving
several doses of the indicated 2 remedies in aqueous solution for 4-5
days.
Yes, many things have an effect. Some are short-termed, others
long-termed.
All the best,

Gaby

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gaby Rottler,
Germany
rottler@curantur.de

http://www.curantur.de
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~