Page 3 of 3

Re: Classical Homoeopathy

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 5:24 pm
by Bob Needham
A very open minded approach That's good. All of this was summed up several
years ago when some said to me " homeopathy is a diagnosis of symptoms,
conventional medicine is a diagnosis of disease" . Two completely different
philosophies and protocols. The concern I have with the polypharmacy is that
it takes it's basis from a diagnosis of the diseased state. That approach
can create a hybrid analysis that more times than enough shorts both
homeopathy and allopathy.

Bob

Re: Classical Homoeopathy

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 10:24 pm
by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
“But what up sets me is that people who have never read the Organon or
the Chronic Diseases are trying to tell us what Homoeopathy is all
about".

How would you know that about any one of the people who are posting on
this list?

Baseless assumption...........

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".

Re: Classical Homoeopathy

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2002 1:10 am
by Dave Hartley
A perfectly valid assumption, in context, and in light of repeated
sidestepping of straightforward questions.
Dave Hartley
www.Mr-Notebook.com
www.localcomputermart.com/dave
Seattle, WA 425.820.7443
Asheville, NC 828.285.0240