Page 3 of 4
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2001 12:29 pm
by Sheila Parks
dear joy, i hope i am on your list to receive these notes. thanks for your
generosity in doing this for all of us. happy holidays to all. sheila
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2001 12:33 am
by Chris_Gillen
Dear Joy,
Yep, to me also to suit windows,
Thanks for your generosity.
Chris
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2001 1:46 am
by Donna Earnest
Joy,
Thank you so very much. That is very kind of you. Have a great holiday.
Donna E
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2001 5:09 pm
by Wendy Howard
> Dear Joy,
Me too please.
warmly
Wendy
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2001 7:14 pm
by Dr Ramachandra
Dear Joy Lucas
I have small book of Dr Foubister's Carcinocin.
I prescribe Carcincin in children as well as elders..
I prescribe Carcincin 200,1Mand 10M Once in 2-3 months gap where ever
FAMILY history of Diabetes,Tuberculosis or I think graft of three miasms is
there. like Mental back wardness ,Autism ,ADHD, and even in caseses of
Cerebral palsyIt is also very effective in treament of DIABETES,(iddm) and
Cancer patients.
I also prescribe Carcinosin to prevent Diabetes Mellitus, or Cancer.if
present in Family History
It is very useful NOSODE .No spcial precaution is required .One should only
repeat at long interval.
Any information other than mentioned in Dr Foubisters book is welcome .
I request you to mail to me also Bob Micklem's Compendum on Carcinocin
Thanking you in advance,
With Good Wishes for NEW YEAR
Ramachandra
Hyderabad.INDIA
.At 01:05 PM 12/14/01 +0000, Joy Lucas wrote:
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2001 6:02 pm
by suzannemerritt
Plese could you send me a copy of the carcinosin note
Sue
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2002 11:38 am
by dachem87
Dear Joy,
I would greatly appreciate the notes as well if possible whenever you have
the time.
Thankyou
Sincerely Dalia
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2002 1:49 am
by twhite7101
Joy, the carcinosin notes, if you are still sending them out, and not too
bored by te whole thing yet, then could you send them to me>.
twhite7101@aol.com
Thanks
Terry
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:51 pm
by Shannon Nelson
For reasons unknown, I was taught that Carcinosin should be given in 30c or 200c, rather than higher. Since then I have gathered that others choose potency for that remedy in the same way as any other, and often give it much higher. Does anyone have observations about this, any idea why I might have been taught that or whether should be approached differently from any other remedy as far as potency?
I would like to do Finbonacci series on this case, but I am thinking there may be compliance issues initially, so want to begin instead with a high potency single dose. 200c seems fine for this case, but it brought this old question to mind.
Thanks,
Shannon
Re: carcinosin
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:35 pm
by Rochelle
From clinical experience I give Carc in 3 doses- 30, 200, 1M in 24 hours. I know this is a British quirky way of giving a constitutional Rx but with this Rx I have found I don’t get aggs giving it this way whereas I did as a single potency. I always say if any of the potencies immediately have some effect then don’t take the next one and contact me. I also now give the T15 version i.e. a Carc with 15 different nosodes in it.
FWIW
Rochelle
From:
minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Nelson
Sent: 13 March 2013 19:51
To:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] carcinosin
For reasons unknown, I was taught that Carcinosin should be given in 30c or 200c, rather than higher. Since then I have gathered that others choose potency for that remedy in the same way as any other, and often give it much higher. Does anyone have observations about this, any idea why I might have been taught that or whether should be approached differently from any other remedy as far as potency?
I would like to do Finbonacci series on this case, but I am thinking there may be compliance issues initially, so want to begin instead with a high potency single dose. 200c seems fine for this case, but it brought this old question to mind.
Thanks,
Shannon