Strange case

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Rochelle
Posts: 4167
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by Rochelle »

Dear Joy,

You wrote:-


I having been working on this case and I can't find this represented in the rep anywhere? Is it there? Water I know the skin is sensitive to but he hasn't actually said this.

Regards
Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Rochelle
Posts: 4167
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by Rochelle »

I have just found in Murphy Wind agg - sulphur in ordinary type (as was Thuja :-)) However I have found in RU, Face; discoloration; red; weather; cold, in:, sulph[1] However I suppose that isn't the same as flushing.

Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk


Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by Shannon Nelson »

on 8/7/04 6:27 PM, rochelle at rochelle@ntlworld.com wrote:
Hm, that seems like a puzzling rubric. Isn't it *normal* for the face to
become red in cold weath???? Can anyone explain that rubric?

Shannon


J Lucas
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by J Lucas »

I tend to use MM's more than reps and more importantly you will find this in
the MM's. For the Reps, possibly under atmospheric changes and certainly
under

I having been working on this case and I can't find this represented in the
rep anywhere? Is it there? Water I know the skin is sensitive to but he
hasn't actually said this.

Regards
Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


J Lucas
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by J Lucas »

I wouldn't say it was that normal but you would use this if it was very much
part of the case and bordering on extremes. Often it is just someone's nose
that might turn red but this will mean much more of the whole face.

Joy

www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
on 8/8/04 1:13 AM, Bob&Shannon at shannonnelson@tds.net wrote:

on 8/7/04 6:27 PM, rochelle at rochelle@ntlworld.com wrote:
Hm, that seems like a puzzling rubric. Isn't it *normal* for the face to
become red in cold weath???? Can anyone explain that rubric?

Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Rochelle
Posts: 4167
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by Rochelle »

Dear Jean,
I have just got around to looking at this Rx and I really like it! for him! It's a pity there is only Scholten to look at about it but at least he gave us a case. Thank you so much for pointing it out to me. I am still waiting for him to answer my email questions after which I will make a decision.

Regards
Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk


Rochelle
Posts: 4167
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by Rochelle »

A couple of weeks ago we were discussing this case and Patricia came up with NOSE coryza, stool, during: thuj because I was considering Sulphur and Thuja. It has taken 2 weeks for this lad to e mail me back the answers to my questions one of which was "Is there any time when you have your blocked nose that it runs? If so what colour is the discharge." The answer was a straight "no". So that's the end of that one!!
Family medical history that he sent was >

I also got some new information as I was in a muddle about completely understanding when these flushes arise.

( I despair at the spelling of a lad who is at university!! They all spell as if they are cell phone texting!!)

So we now have sweating amel. or even < supressed sweat. Now I can find Ailments from suppressed perspiration in Murphy but not in RU. Can anyone help me out here? In RU I found in Generalities Perspiration amel Sulp in black type but thuja plain type however I am confused because there is also Mod. Perspiration amel During , and another Perspiration amel After but have decided it's none of those because as long as he perspires he is OK!!

Sulphur is there as black type and I think that is now good enough for me and I may take him round some tonight. My only thought is what potency. Not 200 as that may agg. Possibly 1M. I don't really think I have much faith in 1 dose of 30 as I reckon most people would benefit from that!!

Any comments appreciated as usual!

Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk


J Lucas
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by J Lucas »

Apart from the fact that there is a h/o antibiotics and thus some
suppression, why not make this your first LM case. And why do you not have
faith in a single dose of 30c - I don't understand this.

Best, Joy

www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
on 26/8/04 5:51 PM, rochelle at rochelle@ntlworld.com wrote:

A couple of weeks ago we were discussing this case and Patricia came up with
NOSE coryza, stool, during: thuj because I was considering Sulphur and
Thuja. It has taken 2 weeks for this lad to e mail me back the answers to my
questions one of which was "Is there any time when you have your blocked
nose that it runs? If so what colour is the discharge." The answer was a
straight "no". So that's the end of that one!!
Family medical history that he sent was >

I also got some new information as I was in a muddle about completely
understanding when these flushes arise.

( I despair at the spelling of a lad who is at
university!! They all spell as if they are cell phone texting!!)

So we now have sweating amel. or even < supressed sweat. Now I can find
Ailments from suppressed perspiration in Murphy but not in RU. Can anyone
help me out here? In RU I found in Generalities Perspiration amel Sulp in
black type but thuja plain type however I am confused because there is also
Mod. Perspiration amel During , and another Perspiration amel After but have
decided it's none of those because as long as he perspires he is OK!!

Sulphur is there as black type and I think that is now good enough for me
and I may take him round some tonight. My only thought is what potency. Not
200 as that may agg. Possibly 1M. I don't really think I have much faith in
1 dose of 30 as I reckon most people would benefit from that!!

Any comments appreciated as usual!

Rochelle
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Rochelle
Posts: 4167
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by Rochelle »

I don't think so :-)!!!! C potencies have worked for me so far so why change?

I look on a 30 for a constitutional prescription as something I would only give a child or a highly sensitive, immune suppressed adult and then I would give a split dose. It's just that I have always been a high prescriber and have been lucky that it has worked for my patients. I used to give 1 dose and wait but after attending Dr Ramakrishnans post grad course I was impressed when he reckons that we don't prescribe often enough and sometimes lose the patient through that. His standard prescription is 3 pillules of 200C 4x in a day and repeat in a fortnight. He doesn't appear to get any major aggs . I have tried this prescribing on occasions and it's worked well. His standard for an acute is 30 or 200 , 6 to 10 times in a day for 2 days!! As usual we all do things different ways with posology and I reckon that as long as it works for you and your patients it probably doesn't matter too much how you prescribe provided we are talking about 1 remedy at a time which is homeopathic to the patient at that time.

Regards
Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk


Phillip Wade
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Strange case

Post by Phillip Wade »

Just to add to that: Did not Hahnemann say something like: "The greatest
mistake I can make is toconsider that a remedy is too dilute..."
Phil Wade


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”