Re: Leg ulcers
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 2:18 am
"If the matter is one that can be settled by observation, make the
observation yourself." (Bertrand Russell)
***I am not a spokesperson for Indian or other homoeopaths who may prescribe
oft repeated doses of remedies. I am simply a practitioner who has available
to her, in one eg. the results of 70 yrs of clinical observations. I could
type stuff from one of these books about what the particular author believes
if you want, but it is not my opinion - I am only
It would be more useful for all of us, if those practitioners on the various
lists, who use these methods successfully, would share their experience with
us.
It is not inconceivable to me, that out of clinics with large numbers
passing through them every day, and clinical notes being rigorously kept,
that eventually, these clinicians would see patterns of treatment that serve
patients better than others. Who am I to disagree with their observations? I
would rather listen to them, try it and then comment.
Re the repetition of high potencies - the source I have uses potencies from
tincture to 1M - and only prescribes the repetitions based on experience.
Each individual case requires a different prescription obviously, and the
management of the case is the key to success.
Re aggravations - where is the evidence that aggravations are common? I have
not had more than one reported aggravation in my practice. Obviously, there
are going to be some persons who are highly sensitive who will prove or
aggravate one dose of a remedy - and without any evidence of the occurence
of these incidents, why should we believe that it is common? For all we
know, it could be 1 in 10,000 people who will aggravate on one dose or prove
a remedy. Does this mean that we should not use repeated doses on all the
others who would not aggravate, or prove?
I feel that since Hahnemann, there is plenty of clinical evidence for
treatment surfacing and it is our duty to explore this and if it works, take
it on board. Why should this be a problem?
Robyn
Noone on this list including myself would condone the over the counter
methods that Venkat described - this is not what I am talking about. This is
just what he described as his experience. I don't think it is fair to extend
this to all wouldn't you agree?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.627 / Virus Database: 402 - Release Date: 16/03/2004
observation yourself." (Bertrand Russell)
***I am not a spokesperson for Indian or other homoeopaths who may prescribe
oft repeated doses of remedies. I am simply a practitioner who has available
to her, in one eg. the results of 70 yrs of clinical observations. I could
type stuff from one of these books about what the particular author believes
if you want, but it is not my opinion - I am only
It would be more useful for all of us, if those practitioners on the various
lists, who use these methods successfully, would share their experience with
us.
It is not inconceivable to me, that out of clinics with large numbers
passing through them every day, and clinical notes being rigorously kept,
that eventually, these clinicians would see patterns of treatment that serve
patients better than others. Who am I to disagree with their observations? I
would rather listen to them, try it and then comment.
Re the repetition of high potencies - the source I have uses potencies from
tincture to 1M - and only prescribes the repetitions based on experience.
Each individual case requires a different prescription obviously, and the
management of the case is the key to success.
Re aggravations - where is the evidence that aggravations are common? I have
not had more than one reported aggravation in my practice. Obviously, there
are going to be some persons who are highly sensitive who will prove or
aggravate one dose of a remedy - and without any evidence of the occurence
of these incidents, why should we believe that it is common? For all we
know, it could be 1 in 10,000 people who will aggravate on one dose or prove
a remedy. Does this mean that we should not use repeated doses on all the
others who would not aggravate, or prove?
I feel that since Hahnemann, there is plenty of clinical evidence for
treatment surfacing and it is our duty to explore this and if it works, take
it on board. Why should this be a problem?
Robyn
Noone on this list including myself would condone the over the counter
methods that Venkat described - this is not what I am talking about. This is
just what he described as his experience. I don't think it is fair to extend
this to all wouldn't you agree?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.627 / Virus Database: 402 - Release Date: 16/03/2004