Page 3 of 7
Re: Hello
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 11:18 am
by priya p s
hi anita,
i am Dr. priyanka from mumbai.
Re: Hello
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2002 5:11 am
by ANITA SALUNKHE
Hi! priyanka from were??/
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
http://messenger.msn.com
Re: Hello
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 12:23 pm
by Liz Lalor
Important bill!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Hello
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 5:45 pm
by Cl.Mennel
Important notice!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Hello
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 5:51 pm
by Hans Radax
Important details!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Hello
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:49 pm
by HomeoDidact
Important!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Hello
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 4:22 pm
by hannahfroukje
Important!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Hello
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:20 pm
by Eric Leventhal Arthen
Important data!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Hello
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:35 pm
by Liz Lalor
Important details!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Hello
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 5:37 am
by jagchat01
Dear List,
I am not a homoeopathic doctor but have tried to study the science
since 1977, that makes it 27 years. I do not practice. From the
perspective of a patient what I have found is that homoeopathy as it
is practised by most qualified homoeopaths is a wee bit different
from what is prescribed in the Organon and other classical texts.
The homoeopathy courses offered by various colleges and universities
too seem to be more interested in giving its students a "modern"
perspective of disease rather than making them aware of classical
homoeopathy. As a result most of the students who pass out are a
confused lot.
I believe that the most important part of homoeopathy is the case
taking. But very few doctors maintain records. The most common
explanation given is that patients are wary of intense questioning.
Well, if homoeopathy has to stand out and make itself felt then
these anomalies have to be rectified. The patients do not mind if
the allopaths subject them to a retinue of costly clinical tests, so
is it so difficult for them to answer a few questions?
My grievances are not merely intellectual. As a chronic patient I
had to suffer from the whims and fancies of many a so called
homoeopath for about 25 years before I found the good soul who
treats me now. I doubt if every patient will have that kind of faith
and patience. They would rather conclude that homoeopathy is a pain
in the neck.
Regards,
Jagannath.