Re: holding penis in 7 yr old - Update
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2003 6:58 pm
Dear Shannon, from my point of view I did say that I had missed most of
these posts and there seemed to be nothing else to the case except for the
'handling' (for whatever reason) of the penis. If the other 2 sx are or
were, at some point, prominent sx, then this does give even more credibility
to choosing Merc. This is keynote prescribing but if that is all there is,
then so be it - that is the 'deep' totality, although that 'deepness' seems
quite shallow, but it is THE case, unless, of course there are other issues
which we have not been told.
Personally, I think it is so much easier when there are not many sx or
rubrics to choose from and I always 'trim' cases right down to their bare
essentials - perhaps you might want to try that sometime, just as an
experiment - take just a few of the guiding sx of a case and work with those
and see what you come up with. Let's do that with the case you are about to
show us?
Symptoms are just that, signs of what is going on. Simple grading of them is
usually enough without making the case too complicated.
Best wishes, Joy
on 8/20/03 4:13 PM, Bob&Shannon at shannonnelson@tds.net wrote:
Hi Patricia and Joy,
I'm puzzled by this... I don't understand why we can say Merc represents a
"deeper totality" simply by virtue of covering these three rubrics. Over
and over I have cases where a given remedy covers *many* rubrics -- each of
which was carefully considered and IMO strong in the case, and yet the
remedy doesn't act. (Actually I'm getting ready to put one of them up, and
so this dicussion seems very appropos to that!)
I'm not meaning this in a critical way -- my prescribing is *way* too
hit-or-miss for me to get critical! -- but trying to understand. I
understand this (the concomitant and 3 rubrics) to be a terrific basis for
*considering* Merc, but I would have thought there needed to be lots more
indications to justify giving it???? Also, two of the three I would have
considered local symptoms and thereby not so compelling (burning urethra and
lice -- I realize that lice occur only according to susceptibility, but then
so does burning urethra... Help!).
??
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
these posts and there seemed to be nothing else to the case except for the
'handling' (for whatever reason) of the penis. If the other 2 sx are or
were, at some point, prominent sx, then this does give even more credibility
to choosing Merc. This is keynote prescribing but if that is all there is,
then so be it - that is the 'deep' totality, although that 'deepness' seems
quite shallow, but it is THE case, unless, of course there are other issues
which we have not been told.
Personally, I think it is so much easier when there are not many sx or
rubrics to choose from and I always 'trim' cases right down to their bare
essentials - perhaps you might want to try that sometime, just as an
experiment - take just a few of the guiding sx of a case and work with those
and see what you come up with. Let's do that with the case you are about to
show us?
Symptoms are just that, signs of what is going on. Simple grading of them is
usually enough without making the case too complicated.
Best wishes, Joy
on 8/20/03 4:13 PM, Bob&Shannon at shannonnelson@tds.net wrote:
Hi Patricia and Joy,
I'm puzzled by this... I don't understand why we can say Merc represents a
"deeper totality" simply by virtue of covering these three rubrics. Over
and over I have cases where a given remedy covers *many* rubrics -- each of
which was carefully considered and IMO strong in the case, and yet the
remedy doesn't act. (Actually I'm getting ready to put one of them up, and
so this dicussion seems very appropos to that!)
I'm not meaning this in a critical way -- my prescribing is *way* too
hit-or-miss for me to get critical! -- but trying to understand. I
understand this (the concomitant and 3 rubrics) to be a terrific basis for
*considering* Merc, but I would have thought there needed to be lots more
indications to justify giving it???? Also, two of the three I would have
considered local symptoms and thereby not so compelling (burning urethra and
lice -- I realize that lice occur only according to susceptibility, but then
so does burning urethra... Help!).
??
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]