Minutus

Shannon Nelson · Post by **Shannon Nelson** » Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:15 pm

Hi Jeremy,

That's wonderful to hear about! But I'm curious why you did not feel that
the thuja alone would clear up his fears--I would have expected it to
(covers various sorts of fear and anxiety, including "anxiety about the
future", "fear of impending disease", "...of misfortune", "...of an
ordeal"...) I also wonder why give a high potency only one day to act? I
find it *really* hard to believe that he needed *all* of those remedies
(since I have never yet seen any "need" multiple remedies once the "right"
remedy was given).

The outcome sounds good, but I'm curious to understand the reasoning behind
the method?

(Perhaps you/he assume that a 6c would not reach into the level of the
fears, but in my experience if the remedy is correct, it *will*!)

Thanks for sharing this,
Shannon
on 12/6/04 7:14 AM, jeremycrowley@aol.com at jeremycrowley@aol.com wrote:

H.T. Cotter · Post by **H.T. Cotter** » Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:38 pm

Hi Jeremy,

You say before treating your first AIDS patient; have you treated many with this procedure? How many? What has been your success ratio? Do you also treat cancer patients? How many? Success ratio?

Thanks,

Tom

Jeremy Crowley · Post by **Jeremy Crowley** » Thu Dec 09, 2004 10:42 pm

Hi Tom
He is the only HIV patient I have treated. I have treated quite a few
patients with cancer, but they have all been using Conventional treatment. They
generaly come for treatment for some other problem, and say 'by the way I have
cancer too' . They have generally done very well, but atributed their survival
to the miracles of Chemo/radiation or whatever - who knows? If they get
better thats great. I have used that Aconite Arsenicum Stramonium Opium sequence,
or variations on the theme on several of them and it generally works well.
They get much calmer, sleep better and seem to react to other remedies well
afterwards. On some patients it needs repeating frequently. interspersed with
usualy low potency remedies for the physical pathology. These days I usualy
use muscle testing to determine the potencies, and if they react best to high
potencies, thats what they get, often repeated frequently. There has been a
discusion on this list lately about frequent repetition of high potencies. A
lot of homeopaths seem to be finding that this works well, but many do not want
to admit to it publcly.
Jeremy
Re: Re: HIV

Hi Jeremy,

You say before treating your first AIDS patient; have you treated many with
this procedure? How many? What has been your success ratio? Do you also
treat cancer patients? How many? Success ratio?

Thanks,

Tom
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

dusty1197 · Post by **dusty1197** » Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:41 pm

Sorry for coming in late. How is the Acon/Ars/Stram/Op sequence
typically administered? Aside from its use in cases with serious
pathology, how else might it be used? I have a case of a youth with
fearfulness/fears that incorporate characteristics from all of the
remedies mentioned. Has anyone ever combined the four remedies into
one (classically UNclassical) combination?

Toni
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, jeremycrowley@a... wrote:
few
treatment. They
the way I have
their survival
they get
Opium sequence,
works well.
remedies well
interspersed with
days I usualy
best to high
has been a
potencies. A
many do not want
many with
you also

Shannon Nelson · Post by **Shannon Nelson** » Fri Dec 10, 2004 3:56 am

Hi Jeremy,

When you talk about frequent repetition of high potencies, are you speaking
particularly of cancer patients, or would you sometimes do that even with
more minor problems? I'm curious because, in my experience if a high
potency *needs* frequent repetition in an average sort of functional case,
then the remedy is not right and the remedy will lose its effectiveness in a
shortish period of time (days to months).

When you muscle test, do you have a method for differentiating among the
various degrees of "good"--e.g. between a remedy that would be helpful for a
few days but then need changing, versus a remedy that will act long and
deep?

Thanks!
Shannon

on 12/9/04 3:42 PM, jeremycrowley@aol.com at jeremycrowley@aol.com wrote:

H.T. Cotter · Post by **H.T. Cotter** » Fri Dec 10, 2004 4:34 am

Hi Jeremy,

Thank you for your quick and informative response. One of my favorite grandsons is named Jeremy. I noted in your earlier writings on this subject that you had used a book on homeopathic Aids treatment for guidance, and that they (or was it another teacher) had recommended that particular fear-eliminating sequence. I had a best selling book out on homeopathy in the treatment of AIDS and another on the treatment of cancers (getting dated now). I treat cancer patients all over the world and around this country (America).

In the first decade or so of my practice, like many people having converted to homeopathy, I was a purist. One dose of one remedy per patient. Really daring to give them repetitive doses. Combination remedies and intermittent dosings were definitely not homeopathy and like any sophomoric zealot, I was eager to tell anyone who listened about how homeopathy and its purity had to be preserved. It wasn't just my practice, it was my philosophy and I was truly (in my mind) Hahnemann's St. Paul. (Ring a bell?)

When I first met the genius Dr. Roy Curtin, I was appalled that other doctors on the team were routinely prescribing combinations and intermittents and (to my chagrin) were getting their patients well rather quickly. I think that many of the proscriptions from the great Hahnemann were based upon a somewhat limited technology of the time. Thanks to geniuses like Drs. Goodheart, Voll, and Curtin, we now have tremendous tools to see how the patient will react to complex remedies.

In the 19th century the ranks of homeopathy were split between the highs and the lows. Some insist that not strictly adhering to the great principles elucidated by our founders will end up in suppressed illness with short term palliation. I'm glad that we have such a good part of this art that is stewarded by such wonderful men and women. Likewise, many people have found they can treat their families symptoms by comparing the remedies to the disease symptoms and select single remedies, or even buying combinations with the name of the disease as the only guiding criteria and are freeing themselves from the obscene cost of modern western medicine. Other groupings amongst us can be found on those who like to out doctor-talk the allopaths with erudite strings of Latin verbiage. Hahnemann said that the provers spoke in the common language, so do our patients and so should we. But those erudite members can bridge gaps with our allopathic brothers and sisters who are fond of impressing their audiences. We all have a place in this. It works on many modalities and many levels.

As to how cancer patients on parallel therapy works, I've often heard oncological colleagues saying, "Wow, that chemotherapy is finally starting to work!"

Anyway, enjoyed reading your piece and enjoy the exuberance of so many people contributing to this list.

Best wishes,

Dr. H. Thomas Cotter (Tom)

Sandeep Saluja · Post by **Sandeep Saluja** » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:50 am

I regularly use antiretroviral therapy for my HIV positive patients.What homeopaathic drug may help additionally significantly?
Best wishes.

Maria Bohle · Post by **Maria Bohle** » Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:58 pm

Hello Dr. Saluja,

It is wonderful to see you interested in the possibilities of homeopathic treatment for HIV.

Homeopathic medicine is unique in that it treats the patients under the diagnosed ailments, based not on the common symptoms of the disorder but based on how the patient responds under the burden of pathology. That is not to say we ignore the diagnosed condition we take it into account certainly, but are always looking for the peculiar symptoms the patient is exhibiting.

For instance a burning pain that is better by heat, the diabetic who is thirstless despite high sugar levels in the blood, etc.

We homeopaths do have remedies said to be very effective with HIV, and certainly there is some indications that homeopathy has been successful with this disorder. If we have a few common medicines for this plus strange, rare and peculiar symptoms in people with this disorder, our success rate can greatly improve.

So, the answer to your questions, yes we have remedies, and those remedies have been known to work if patient factors match.

Sincerely,
Maria

John R. Benneth · Post by **John R. Benneth** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:04 am

Carc. (Get help from an exp. homeopath)
In a message dated 9/9/2014 2:50:13 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)

Sheri Nakken · Post by **Sheri Nakken** » Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:44 pm

HIV never proven to cause anything.
AIDS is just the name for a grouping of symptoms.
Each case needs to be taken by a qualified homeopath to determine a curative remedy.

Sheri
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases and Child Health
Next classes start September