This is true to some degree. However, it is totally valid as people are trying to avoid a vituperative political
fight that betrays the focus of this group--homeopathy!
t
The vote that supports Big Pharma and mandatory vaccinations...
-
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm
-
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm
Re: The vote that supports Big Pharma and mandatory vaccinations...
Deb
The problem is one of too little, too late. People need to be organizing and building a movement that
allows more parties. The FAIR Elections movement is critical but most people don't know about it.
Also, people need to get over their social issues which are used to divide people and learn to identify
the core issues that really affect their lives, like meaningful jobs, free education, undoing fascist laws
like Citizens United. Getting off one's duff for election season does not work for creating change.
t
The problem is one of too little, too late. People need to be organizing and building a movement that
allows more parties. The FAIR Elections movement is critical but most people don't know about it.
Also, people need to get over their social issues which are used to divide people and learn to identify
the core issues that really affect their lives, like meaningful jobs, free education, undoing fascist laws
like Citizens United. Getting off one's duff for election season does not work for creating change.
t
-
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
The vote that supports Big Pharma and mandatory vaccinations...
And really, we're all "case studies", aren't we? I don't mean just on this list, I mean everyone. And in our homeopathy training, it's how we learn to see the world.
I think that the exploration can be done either seriously and respectfully, *or* in a flip and sarcastic way. I for one would hope we can avoid the latter, but all (hopefully including the casetakee) find interest in the former.
But, maybe a good protocol would be to ask permission before beginning any "analysis". So it's seen all around as an exploration, not a judgment or attack (and I think Hennie's post attempts that nicely).
Shannon
I think that the exploration can be done either seriously and respectfully, *or* in a flip and sarcastic way. I for one would hope we can avoid the latter, but all (hopefully including the casetakee) find interest in the former.
But, maybe a good protocol would be to ask permission before beginning any "analysis". So it's seen all around as an exploration, not a judgment or attack (and I think Hennie's post attempts that nicely).
Shannon
-
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm