If you were asked to suggest a homeopathic remedy for Clinton, Trump or Bernie, what would you suggest?
Atb,
Leilanae
Homeopathic types
-
Allen Coniglio
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Homeopathic types
I would start out by saying that Clinton and Trump are both animal remedies. Clinton is aggressive, territorial, greedy, fearful, will strike in the dark at whomever she perceives to be her enemy - which is most everyone - vindictive to the extreme, underhanded, untrustworthy, corrupt, deadly (she has been involved in numerous murders, threats, intimidation of witnesses, etc. (look it up please), pathologically dishonest, psychopathic and sociopathic, a true deceiver. She would almost certainly be a snake, maybe Lachesis but any other snake is possible. Scorpio is also a possibility but more likely a snake as that is what her character is predominantly. You will not know that she has any of these qualities if you do not pay attention or if you watch only the corrupt, purposely deceptive lamestream news which treats her as Saint Hillary. That is their job which they are paid to do. That assessment includes ALL of the major network news sources including Fox News which is a sham and a LIE, an entity which exists solely to deceive, mislead, and misdirect the people.
Trump is an animal as well. He is aggressive but not pathologically like Clinton, direct, competitive, magnetic, a leader, deadly to an enemy, loyal, confident, dominant, powerful, fierce, independent, responsible,disciplined, patient, determined, a high flyer but down to earth, plays the game of the rich and powerful but refers often to his roots among the "common" people, an enemy and hunter of snakes - Haliaeetus leucocephalus [Haliae-lc.] - American Bald Eagle
Trump is a guy who is easy to misunderstand. Many people do not like him simply because he is rich. Bear in mind that if he were not rich, he would not be able to do what he is doing - attacking the nwo establishment which is centered in their control of ALL major political parties which always put up candidates who are owned by them and who will do their bidding. No person who is not a billionaire could ever even begin to run for president on his own without the support of the phony 2 party system. He is a true threat to the serpents of our Age, the nwo. This is why the republican party would rather support Hillary (another serpent) than to support Trump. What is the difference? The democrats and republicans are two sides of the same coin. There is no difference between them. The establishment fears and hates Trump because he is exposing them. This is why the working class people love him. He is exposing the lying serpents and he is offering them their first chance at freedom from the serpents who have been devouring them for years. The establishment realizes the damage he could do to them and so they attack him calling him "racist" and making up all kinds of lies about him. That message is dutifully carried to the world by their lapdogs in the media all of whom have been domesticated and are under the full control of the nwo. Trump sees what he sees because he flies high and has great vision. He is not perfect - even eagles have defects - but he kills snakes. Remember that. And remember who and what is his power base - the working people of America and the world, people of every race and background. Do your research!!! It is easy to deny these things if you have no knowledge.
I do not know enough about Bernie to really define him. I would say that he appears very dutiful and dogmatic. He is a true believer, maybe a bit too gullible. Maybe even a bit slow mentally. But he is a plodder. He plods along. He continues on his path. He remains focused on the prize. He appears to be honest although he should not believe some of the things he believes, in my opinion. At his age, he should have matured and abandoned some of the beliefs that he had when he was young, foolish, and naive, and lacking in information and life experience. He should have changed his views on socialism which at best, is a theoretical construct which never works but always damages people. Look at Venezuela. Look at the old Soviet Union. Look at anyplace where it has ever been allowed to exist. Look at the large trails of people trying to get out and at the tiny trickle wanting to get in. Wake up, Bernie. He is a mineral. A slow one. Maybe a Calc Carb.
Trump is an animal as well. He is aggressive but not pathologically like Clinton, direct, competitive, magnetic, a leader, deadly to an enemy, loyal, confident, dominant, powerful, fierce, independent, responsible,disciplined, patient, determined, a high flyer but down to earth, plays the game of the rich and powerful but refers often to his roots among the "common" people, an enemy and hunter of snakes - Haliaeetus leucocephalus [Haliae-lc.] - American Bald Eagle
Trump is a guy who is easy to misunderstand. Many people do not like him simply because he is rich. Bear in mind that if he were not rich, he would not be able to do what he is doing - attacking the nwo establishment which is centered in their control of ALL major political parties which always put up candidates who are owned by them and who will do their bidding. No person who is not a billionaire could ever even begin to run for president on his own without the support of the phony 2 party system. He is a true threat to the serpents of our Age, the nwo. This is why the republican party would rather support Hillary (another serpent) than to support Trump. What is the difference? The democrats and republicans are two sides of the same coin. There is no difference between them. The establishment fears and hates Trump because he is exposing them. This is why the working class people love him. He is exposing the lying serpents and he is offering them their first chance at freedom from the serpents who have been devouring them for years. The establishment realizes the damage he could do to them and so they attack him calling him "racist" and making up all kinds of lies about him. That message is dutifully carried to the world by their lapdogs in the media all of whom have been domesticated and are under the full control of the nwo. Trump sees what he sees because he flies high and has great vision. He is not perfect - even eagles have defects - but he kills snakes. Remember that. And remember who and what is his power base - the working people of America and the world, people of every race and background. Do your research!!! It is easy to deny these things if you have no knowledge.
I do not know enough about Bernie to really define him. I would say that he appears very dutiful and dogmatic. He is a true believer, maybe a bit too gullible. Maybe even a bit slow mentally. But he is a plodder. He plods along. He continues on his path. He remains focused on the prize. He appears to be honest although he should not believe some of the things he believes, in my opinion. At his age, he should have matured and abandoned some of the beliefs that he had when he was young, foolish, and naive, and lacking in information and life experience. He should have changed his views on socialism which at best, is a theoretical construct which never works but always damages people. Look at Venezuela. Look at the old Soviet Union. Look at anyplace where it has ever been allowed to exist. Look at the large trails of people trying to get out and at the tiny trickle wanting to get in. Wake up, Bernie. He is a mineral. A slow one. Maybe a Calc Carb.
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Homeopathic types
On 6/25/16 10:30 AM, Allen Coniglio allen73call@gmail.com [minutus] wrote:
Taking this foray hesitantly, but -- how does this assessment below
square with things like his treatment of dissenting, or even just in his
opinion funny-looking, attendees at rallies, the remarks like "Throw
them out in the cold. Don't give their coats back," invitations for his
ushers and other attendees to punch people, freely expressed racism and
etc., and also --
how does it square with his many *failed* businesses, and his
misrepresentations of them?
And others of us don't like him because he is pugnacious, abrasive,
belligerent and rude; also crude, gratuitously vulgar, bigoted, and a
loose cannon. He's continuing on the path that's brought him to our
attention: more interested in theatre than in true problem solving.
Apparently neither interested nor well prepared for even understanding
real-world problems, let alone solving them; appearance instead of
substance. The greatest "Beam-Me-Up, Scotty!" candidate yet.
I find it extremely difficult to square his behaviors with your assessment.
Taking this foray hesitantly, but -- how does this assessment below
square with things like his treatment of dissenting, or even just in his
opinion funny-looking, attendees at rallies, the remarks like "Throw
them out in the cold. Don't give their coats back," invitations for his
ushers and other attendees to punch people, freely expressed racism and
etc., and also --
how does it square with his many *failed* businesses, and his
misrepresentations of them?
And others of us don't like him because he is pugnacious, abrasive,
belligerent and rude; also crude, gratuitously vulgar, bigoted, and a
loose cannon. He's continuing on the path that's brought him to our
attention: more interested in theatre than in true problem solving.
Apparently neither interested nor well prepared for even understanding
real-world problems, let alone solving them; appearance instead of
substance. The greatest "Beam-Me-Up, Scotty!" candidate yet.
I find it extremely difficult to square his behaviors with your assessment.
Re: Homeopathic types
I don't do MSM.
However, I have seen a few photos and clips of Trump and he reminds me of a lion roaring around the jungle with his mane/hair flapping in the breeze. Have also noticed a duality in his nature and maybe, not a lot of depth of thought. Overt?
Hillary seems more complex and strategic in her approach. Covert?
Atb,
Leilanae
However, I have seen a few photos and clips of Trump and he reminds me of a lion roaring around the jungle with his mane/hair flapping in the breeze. Have also noticed a duality in his nature and maybe, not a lot of depth of thought. Overt?
Hillary seems more complex and strategic in her approach. Covert?
Atb,
Leilanae
-
Allen Coniglio
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Homeopathic types
Leilanae - The first remedy type that came to mind for me after I said he was animal was Lac Leoninum. I used that remedy once on a girlfriend who was bombastic, abrasive, egotistical, full of good opinions about herself, and the wannabe leader of the pack. She was also very beautiful and could not pass a mirror without staring at it for a few too many seconds. Narcissist? Of course.
I gave her Lac Leoninum and the change was remarkable. She sat like a girl scout with her hands folded in her lap for the next 30 minutes and was almost sickeningly polite, all the while insisting that was the way she always was. She remained "off the edge" for about 2 weeks and gradually came back to what she always had been but she insisted that she had not been affected by the remedy at all. In a sense, I was happy to see her old combative self reemerge because that was the complex, interesting part that had drawn my attention in the first place. The goody goody girl scout was not what I was looking for. Eventually, we broke up because she was too insane to bear but she was very entertaining for the approximately 3 years we stayed together.
I didn't think Trump could use that remedy because he did not fit the remedy picture very well. I probably should have mentioned it as another possibility but I didn't. Glad you brought it up.
I gave her Lac Leoninum and the change was remarkable. She sat like a girl scout with her hands folded in her lap for the next 30 minutes and was almost sickeningly polite, all the while insisting that was the way she always was. She remained "off the edge" for about 2 weeks and gradually came back to what she always had been but she insisted that she had not been affected by the remedy at all. In a sense, I was happy to see her old combative self reemerge because that was the complex, interesting part that had drawn my attention in the first place. The goody goody girl scout was not what I was looking for. Eventually, we broke up because she was too insane to bear but she was very entertaining for the approximately 3 years we stayed together.
I didn't think Trump could use that remedy because he did not fit the remedy picture very well. I probably should have mentioned it as another possibility but I didn't. Glad you brought it up.
-
Allen Coniglio
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Homeopathic types
I forgot to mention that Trump is a Gemini so he would have a certain dual air about him and would not necessarily be too deep, as you said. The key point is "air", which Gemini is. Animal + air = bird = Eagle. He cannot be a canary because canaries do not have 10 billion dollars.
Hillary is a Scorpio which means that she will be very deep, even pathologically so. As an experienced astrologer, I am very aware of her "type" and know that she is of the lower variety of Scorpio. That is to say, she is of the primitive serpent type. This type would be attracted to power, lust, revenge, and a range of the lower emotions. This type would consort with black magic, witchcraft, etc. in order to gain power. She is driven by a lust for power which is apparent for all who really want to see it. Those who do not, never will. Yes, she is complex - like a completely fabricated personality - ostensibly good and caring but in reality, crude and evil. Yes, she is strategic - her strategy is to deceive those with whom she has contact and to gain power, no matter what the cost - to others.
I will say it again and this is not hyperbole. She is a murderer and a career criminal. She is part of what is now known as the Bush-Clinton crime family, structured like the mafia and even more deadly.
I do not say anything that I cannot back up with evidence. Anyone who wishes to know the evidence can research all that I say - and more.
Hillary is a Scorpio which means that she will be very deep, even pathologically so. As an experienced astrologer, I am very aware of her "type" and know that she is of the lower variety of Scorpio. That is to say, she is of the primitive serpent type. This type would be attracted to power, lust, revenge, and a range of the lower emotions. This type would consort with black magic, witchcraft, etc. in order to gain power. She is driven by a lust for power which is apparent for all who really want to see it. Those who do not, never will. Yes, she is complex - like a completely fabricated personality - ostensibly good and caring but in reality, crude and evil. Yes, she is strategic - her strategy is to deceive those with whom she has contact and to gain power, no matter what the cost - to others.
I will say it again and this is not hyperbole. She is a murderer and a career criminal. She is part of what is now known as the Bush-Clinton crime family, structured like the mafia and even more deadly.
I do not say anything that I cannot back up with evidence. Anyone who wishes to know the evidence can research all that I say - and more.
-
Allen Coniglio
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Homeopathic types
Hello Shannon - I appreciate your questions but I see that you have read past my advice to research the things I have said about everyone involved. To answer your questions in just a few lines is not really possible. That is why I advise everyone to do your own research. Not surprisingly, very few are interested in doing that and choose rather to just hang on to their own opinions. Note that opinions are not facts. Everyone has an opinion but not everyone has facts. No one should express an opinion without facts. That is, however, what people are encouraged to do by the powers who seek to - and mostly do - control us.
The facts that I need to reiterate to fully respond to your questions would only serve to irritate you because I know that you have not arrived at a place where you care to hear the facts. Thus, I am not going to get too far into any of those things.
People who are trained to do homeopathic case taking are taught to not judge a person by what you think he might be or because you do not like what you may have heard about him. Yet, most homeopaths that I know seem to do just that. Is it because homeopaths tend to be politically liberal which is accepting of anything in its predetermined script and politically correct which does not allow them to stray too far from the reservation? I deliberately state things this way because I know that there are those who will judge me. Was I right?
People who tend to be socialists/communists tend also to judge anyone who does not think like them and use terms like "racist", "sexist", "bigot", "homophobe", etc to describe them. I cannot tell you how many times I have had those words applied to me. Why? Because I am outspoken and do not accept political correctness or any other government attempts to control my life. We had a fairly involved discussion on these things a few months ago and I do not wish to go there again. Please refer to those posts for more information and explanation.
I used homeopathic principles and techniques combined with some other personally gained methods to come up with the analyses that I made of the candidates. I may be right or I may be wrong. The only thing that matters is that I did it and some people may be interested in how I did it. Those who are not are free to ignore it. I cannot claim to be sure that my analyses are correct as I have never spoken to any of those involved but having watched Clinton for almost 25 years, I can say that I know her well. I can say the same about Trump and as I said, I cannot say the same about Bernie. But I am a careful observer so I trust my observations. I also do not ever let my personal beliefs, political views, or any other such thing affect my dealings with a client - at least as much as I can help it - so I trust that what I am seeing about these candidates is pretty much as things are.
Having said all of the above, I must say again that I never say anything that I cannot back up with facts. I wrote certain things about Clinton that I know are true - murderer, greedy, deceiver, etc. - based on facts. Frankly, homeopathy has taught me to be very disciplined in my approach to such things. Some people will refuse to believe such things because, even though there is much evidence to support it, it does no comport with what they want to believe. That, however, will not change what things actually are.
To wrap this up, let me just answer a few specific things that you said about Trump. First, I am not a Trump supporter. I am an "anyone but another criminal Bush/Clinton" supporter. Thus, I would support anyone over Clinton, including Trump or Bernie.
Click here to enable desktop notifications for Gmail. Learn more Hide
7 of 7,281
10:32 AM (2 hours ago)
Taking this foray hesitantly, but -- how does this assessment below
square with things like his treatment of dissenting, or even just in his
opinion funny-looking, attendees at rallies, the remarks like "Throw
them out in the cold. Don't give their coats back," invitations for his
ushers and other attendees to punch people, freely expressed racism and
etc., and also --
how does it square with his many *failed* businesses, and his
misrepresentations of them?
And others of us don't like him because he is pugnacious, abrasive,
belligerent and rude; also crude, gratuitously vulgar, bigoted, and a
loose cannon. He's continuing on the path that's brought him to our
attention: more interested in theatre than in true problem solving.
Apparently neither interested nor well prepared for even understanding
real-world problems, let alone solving them; appearance instead of
substance. The greatest "Beam-Me-Up, Scotty!" candidate yet.
I find it extremely difficult to square his behaviors with your assessment.
________________________________
Hello Shannon - I would like to just skip this one but if I do, people might believe and be influenced by the things you say. They might also believe that you have caught me in dispensing untruths. Neither of those things is true so I really must answer you publicly.
I appreciate your questions but I see that you have read past my advice to research the things I have said about everyone involved. To answer your questions in just a few lines is not really possible. That is why I advise everyone to do your own research. Not surprisingly, very few are interested in doing that and choose rather to just hang on to their own opinions. Note that opinions are not facts. Everyone has an opinion but not everyone has facts. No one should express an opinion without facts. That is, however, what people are encouraged to do by the powers who seek to - and mostly do - control us.
People who are trained to do homeopathic case taking are taught to not judge a person by what you think he might be or because you do not like what you may have heard about him. Yet, most homeopaths that I know seem to do just that. Why do you think that is?
Because I am outspoken and do not conform myself to political correctness, I too am called racist, bigot, homophobe, etc. by the socialist/communist crowd. Trump is as well but he is none of those things. Investigate. Learn the facts. Throwing stones will not lead one to the truth.
I used homeopathic principles and techniques combined with some other personally gained methods to come up with the analyses that I made of the candidates. I may be right or I may be wrong. The only thing that matters is that I did it and some people may be interested in how I did it. Those who are not are free to ignore it. I cannot claim to be sure that my analyses are correct as I have never spoken to any of those involved but having watched Clinton for almost 25 years, I can say that I know her well. I can say the same about Trump but, as I said before, I cannot say the same about Bernie. I am a careful observer, however, so I trust my observations. I also do not ever let my personal beliefs, political views, or any other such thing affect my dealings with a client - at least as much as I can help it - so I trust that what I am seeing about these candidates is pretty much as things are.
Having said all of the above, I must say again that I never say anything that I cannot back up with facts. I wrote certain things about Clinton that I know are true - murderer, greedy, deceiver, etc. - based on facts. Frankly, homeopathy has taught me to be very disciplined in my approach to such things. Some people will refuse to believe such things because, even though there is much evidence to support it, it does not comport with what they want to believe. That is not good homeopathy, however, and will not change what things actually are.
To wrap this up, let me just answer a few specific things that you said about Trump. First, I am not a Trump supporter. I am an "anyone but another criminal Bush/Clinton" supporter. Thus, I would support anyone over Clinton, including Trump or Bernie.
You said that Trump was rude and encouraged fighting at his rallies. Of course, you are getting your information from the mainstream media which is controlled by those whom Trump is challenging and whose job it is to encourage radicals and crazies to go to Trump's rallies and disrupt them. Please note that they do not do that to Clinton who is the candidate of the establishment. Please also note that those same media are saying in several cases that Trump should be assassinated in complete violation of the law yet nothing has been done about it. I have seen at least two attempts to kill Trump on news videos thus far.
It is outrageous to listen to an untrustworthy source and then parrot that information against another person.
No one on the left should ever speak of how badly dissenters are treated. PC is the tool of the left to stifle dissent before it happens. After it happens, there is the gulag. The charge of racism is another one straight out of the "Rules for Radicals" playbook and it is used to separate and divide us and for no good purpose. Trump is not a racist, nor am I. He has followed the law in his business life. Had he not, his numerous enemies would now be using that against him. However, we have Cattlegate, Whitewatergate, Travelgate, the Clinton Foundation, etc. Where are the prosecutors?
As for this: "And others of us don't like him because he is pugnacious, abrasive,
belligerent and rude; also crude, gratuitously vulgar, bigoted, and a
loose cannon."
All are your opinion, not fact. Haven't we already covered "bigoted" with the racist charge? "Loose cannon" comes straight from CNN after Clinton said it.
"more interested in theatre than in true problem solving"
You don't know yet that the entire electoral process is theater? Which problems have been solved in the past 50 years? They are not meant to be solved. That is the secret to controlling you.
"neither interested nor well prepared for even understanding
real-world problems, let alone solving them"
Solving real world problems by Hillary Clinton - Libya, Syria, Benghazi, "We came, we saw, he died - cackle, cackle, cackle", private e-mail server, etc..
"appearance instead of
substance"
Yes, that is exactly what she is.
The facts that I need to reiterate to fully respond to your questions would only serve to irritate you because I know that you have not arrived at a place where you care to hear the facts. Thus, I am not going to get too far into any of those things.
People who are trained to do homeopathic case taking are taught to not judge a person by what you think he might be or because you do not like what you may have heard about him. Yet, most homeopaths that I know seem to do just that. Is it because homeopaths tend to be politically liberal which is accepting of anything in its predetermined script and politically correct which does not allow them to stray too far from the reservation? I deliberately state things this way because I know that there are those who will judge me. Was I right?
People who tend to be socialists/communists tend also to judge anyone who does not think like them and use terms like "racist", "sexist", "bigot", "homophobe", etc to describe them. I cannot tell you how many times I have had those words applied to me. Why? Because I am outspoken and do not accept political correctness or any other government attempts to control my life. We had a fairly involved discussion on these things a few months ago and I do not wish to go there again. Please refer to those posts for more information and explanation.
I used homeopathic principles and techniques combined with some other personally gained methods to come up with the analyses that I made of the candidates. I may be right or I may be wrong. The only thing that matters is that I did it and some people may be interested in how I did it. Those who are not are free to ignore it. I cannot claim to be sure that my analyses are correct as I have never spoken to any of those involved but having watched Clinton for almost 25 years, I can say that I know her well. I can say the same about Trump and as I said, I cannot say the same about Bernie. But I am a careful observer so I trust my observations. I also do not ever let my personal beliefs, political views, or any other such thing affect my dealings with a client - at least as much as I can help it - so I trust that what I am seeing about these candidates is pretty much as things are.
Having said all of the above, I must say again that I never say anything that I cannot back up with facts. I wrote certain things about Clinton that I know are true - murderer, greedy, deceiver, etc. - based on facts. Frankly, homeopathy has taught me to be very disciplined in my approach to such things. Some people will refuse to believe such things because, even though there is much evidence to support it, it does no comport with what they want to believe. That, however, will not change what things actually are.
To wrap this up, let me just answer a few specific things that you said about Trump. First, I am not a Trump supporter. I am an "anyone but another criminal Bush/Clinton" supporter. Thus, I would support anyone over Clinton, including Trump or Bernie.
Click here to enable desktop notifications for Gmail. Learn more Hide
7 of 7,281
10:32 AM (2 hours ago)
Taking this foray hesitantly, but -- how does this assessment below
square with things like his treatment of dissenting, or even just in his
opinion funny-looking, attendees at rallies, the remarks like "Throw
them out in the cold. Don't give their coats back," invitations for his
ushers and other attendees to punch people, freely expressed racism and
etc., and also --
how does it square with his many *failed* businesses, and his
misrepresentations of them?
And others of us don't like him because he is pugnacious, abrasive,
belligerent and rude; also crude, gratuitously vulgar, bigoted, and a
loose cannon. He's continuing on the path that's brought him to our
attention: more interested in theatre than in true problem solving.
Apparently neither interested nor well prepared for even understanding
real-world problems, let alone solving them; appearance instead of
substance. The greatest "Beam-Me-Up, Scotty!" candidate yet.
I find it extremely difficult to square his behaviors with your assessment.
________________________________
Hello Shannon - I would like to just skip this one but if I do, people might believe and be influenced by the things you say. They might also believe that you have caught me in dispensing untruths. Neither of those things is true so I really must answer you publicly.
I appreciate your questions but I see that you have read past my advice to research the things I have said about everyone involved. To answer your questions in just a few lines is not really possible. That is why I advise everyone to do your own research. Not surprisingly, very few are interested in doing that and choose rather to just hang on to their own opinions. Note that opinions are not facts. Everyone has an opinion but not everyone has facts. No one should express an opinion without facts. That is, however, what people are encouraged to do by the powers who seek to - and mostly do - control us.
People who are trained to do homeopathic case taking are taught to not judge a person by what you think he might be or because you do not like what you may have heard about him. Yet, most homeopaths that I know seem to do just that. Why do you think that is?
Because I am outspoken and do not conform myself to political correctness, I too am called racist, bigot, homophobe, etc. by the socialist/communist crowd. Trump is as well but he is none of those things. Investigate. Learn the facts. Throwing stones will not lead one to the truth.
I used homeopathic principles and techniques combined with some other personally gained methods to come up with the analyses that I made of the candidates. I may be right or I may be wrong. The only thing that matters is that I did it and some people may be interested in how I did it. Those who are not are free to ignore it. I cannot claim to be sure that my analyses are correct as I have never spoken to any of those involved but having watched Clinton for almost 25 years, I can say that I know her well. I can say the same about Trump but, as I said before, I cannot say the same about Bernie. I am a careful observer, however, so I trust my observations. I also do not ever let my personal beliefs, political views, or any other such thing affect my dealings with a client - at least as much as I can help it - so I trust that what I am seeing about these candidates is pretty much as things are.
Having said all of the above, I must say again that I never say anything that I cannot back up with facts. I wrote certain things about Clinton that I know are true - murderer, greedy, deceiver, etc. - based on facts. Frankly, homeopathy has taught me to be very disciplined in my approach to such things. Some people will refuse to believe such things because, even though there is much evidence to support it, it does not comport with what they want to believe. That is not good homeopathy, however, and will not change what things actually are.
To wrap this up, let me just answer a few specific things that you said about Trump. First, I am not a Trump supporter. I am an "anyone but another criminal Bush/Clinton" supporter. Thus, I would support anyone over Clinton, including Trump or Bernie.
You said that Trump was rude and encouraged fighting at his rallies. Of course, you are getting your information from the mainstream media which is controlled by those whom Trump is challenging and whose job it is to encourage radicals and crazies to go to Trump's rallies and disrupt them. Please note that they do not do that to Clinton who is the candidate of the establishment. Please also note that those same media are saying in several cases that Trump should be assassinated in complete violation of the law yet nothing has been done about it. I have seen at least two attempts to kill Trump on news videos thus far.
It is outrageous to listen to an untrustworthy source and then parrot that information against another person.
No one on the left should ever speak of how badly dissenters are treated. PC is the tool of the left to stifle dissent before it happens. After it happens, there is the gulag. The charge of racism is another one straight out of the "Rules for Radicals" playbook and it is used to separate and divide us and for no good purpose. Trump is not a racist, nor am I. He has followed the law in his business life. Had he not, his numerous enemies would now be using that against him. However, we have Cattlegate, Whitewatergate, Travelgate, the Clinton Foundation, etc. Where are the prosecutors?
As for this: "And others of us don't like him because he is pugnacious, abrasive,
belligerent and rude; also crude, gratuitously vulgar, bigoted, and a
loose cannon."
All are your opinion, not fact. Haven't we already covered "bigoted" with the racist charge? "Loose cannon" comes straight from CNN after Clinton said it.
"more interested in theatre than in true problem solving"
You don't know yet that the entire electoral process is theater? Which problems have been solved in the past 50 years? They are not meant to be solved. That is the secret to controlling you.
"neither interested nor well prepared for even understanding
real-world problems, let alone solving them"
Solving real world problems by Hillary Clinton - Libya, Syria, Benghazi, "We came, we saw, he died - cackle, cackle, cackle", private e-mail server, etc..
"appearance instead of
substance"
Yes, that is exactly what she is.
-
Marilyn Harris
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: Homeopathic types
Hi Allen,
Are there (plant + air) or (mineral + air) remedies?
Thanks,
Marilyn
Are there (plant + air) or (mineral + air) remedies?
Thanks,
Marilyn
-
Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Homeopathic types
I am afraid this is not a correct or fair game, as our assessments of politicians will always be coloured by our own systems and concepts of politics, philosophy and way of life.
In other words, if we were to treat them based on what we see and perceive, most probably we would not get the real simillimum.
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz
In other words, if we were to treat them based on what we see and perceive, most probably we would not get the real simillimum.
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz
Re: Homeopathic types
In mythology, Mercury, the first planet from the Sun and ruler of Gemini is known as a messenger of the gods. Mercury is also known as the god of commerce and trade, however, he is also known as the god of thieves and travel.
The chemical element Mercury is commonly known as quicksilver.........it shapeshifts.
People who own or have owned casino's usually have ties with the gambling mafia.
---------------------
The astrological sign Scorpio has been known to have 3 rulers: the Scorpion, the Eagle and the Phoenix.
Atb,
Leilanae
The chemical element Mercury is commonly known as quicksilver.........it shapeshifts.
People who own or have owned casino's usually have ties with the gambling mafia.
---------------------
The astrological sign Scorpio has been known to have 3 rulers: the Scorpion, the Eagle and the Phoenix.
Atb,
Leilanae