I met someone well before 1995 with HIV and he managed to stay healthy by going hardcore cleansing and alternative healing diet and lifestyle. So, I really don't understand what you are saying. Please use smaller words and shorter sentences. If the problem has progressed to AIDS, I would guess that what I suggest could not hurt, but I don't know what the outcome would be. Also, if someone is doing the pharmaceuticals, what I suggest would only help. And try not being so harsh in your response.
Roger Bird
________________________________
From:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
To:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:13:38 -0400
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Jan Scholten UNDER ATTACK for AIDS treatment
Tell that to those HIV+ whose T cells drop below 70 before any drug intervention, then develop Kaposi's sarcoma, pneumonia.
Diet, lifestyle, etc won't help at that point, antiretrovirals will.
Sorry for the reality check, obviously you don't know HIV+ people who develop AIDS and those who died before AIDS drugs were available.
In the USA, AIDS went from death sentence pre 1995 to manageable chronic disease because of drugs.
There are HIV+ who don't develop AIDS, here's one who wanted to have AIDS but couldn't, so he ended up committing suicide.
http://nymag.com/health/bestdoctors/201 ... ds-2014-6/
Another baby born HIV+ but early drugs may have "cured"
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 ... d-hiv.html
If anyone feels HIV is harmless and won't lead to any illness then easy to prove your theory, infect yourself with HIV+ blood or have unprotected sex with someone HIV+ not on AIDS drugs with a high viral load.
Wait a few months, then test yourself at home like doing a pregnancy test.
No need to see an MD or go to a lab for testing.
http://www.walgreens.com/store/c/oraqui ... 0078340f45
Then let us know what happens.
Who's up for the challenge??
Susan