Re: Veterinary Question (was Michael Douglas)
Posted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 2:30 pm
Yes Sue,
I already said that,
my point is that ONLY owners, NOT homeopaths or any other therapist unless they are a vet...this does not help many people or their animals.
If the owner of an animal gets a homeopath to help with their animal, that is considered 'treatment' by the homeopath not the owner and breaks the law.
This is something I have checked.
I personally don't have a problem, I'm lucky being both a lay homeopath and a trained herbalist, (this is how I know, I am bound by the same laws...not saying I wouldn't do it, just that it is against the law to do so, but I'm a healer and just get on and do it at my own risk) a raw feeder, chemical-free, non-vacc'd etc.
I am expressing the frustration that is caused by the long-winded and complicated way the 'system' works here, it is not in the interest of the animals despite it's 'worthy' claims.
And the fee's charged are beyond the means of many people unless they have pet insurance which many don't.
The art of animal husbandry is nearly lost as Christine knows also, it has been replaced by dependency on the veterinary system, everyone is told that they don't know how and should leave such things to the 'experts', and sadly most people believe this, as one person said to me in blank confusion, "but that's why I use the vet so I don't have to waste my time learning all that crap, that's what I pay them for".
This is an attitude I come across regularly, the lack of personal responsibility for anything including their own health, it's the world we live in.
Xmarybabb
I already said that,
my point is that ONLY owners, NOT homeopaths or any other therapist unless they are a vet...this does not help many people or their animals.
If the owner of an animal gets a homeopath to help with their animal, that is considered 'treatment' by the homeopath not the owner and breaks the law.
This is something I have checked.
I personally don't have a problem, I'm lucky being both a lay homeopath and a trained herbalist, (this is how I know, I am bound by the same laws...not saying I wouldn't do it, just that it is against the law to do so, but I'm a healer and just get on and do it at my own risk) a raw feeder, chemical-free, non-vacc'd etc.
I am expressing the frustration that is caused by the long-winded and complicated way the 'system' works here, it is not in the interest of the animals despite it's 'worthy' claims.
And the fee's charged are beyond the means of many people unless they have pet insurance which many don't.
The art of animal husbandry is nearly lost as Christine knows also, it has been replaced by dependency on the veterinary system, everyone is told that they don't know how and should leave such things to the 'experts', and sadly most people believe this, as one person said to me in blank confusion, "but that's why I use the vet so I don't have to waste my time learning all that crap, that's what I pay them for".
This is an attitude I come across regularly, the lack of personal responsibility for anything including their own health, it's the world we live in.
Xmarybabb