Minutus

You are the first Homeopath who has said that they are upfront about the therapy. For that I applaud you.
But for being new I would have to disagree. Isodes in the sense in which we are talking are quite new. The use of isodes in the more traditional sense is a different matter all together. I can find no reference with any validity from any journal with any long term strategies or follow ups with regards to giving potentised vaccines prior to 1994. Do you have other references?
As for the soil, "it" is responsible for the damage to my physical body. So therefore causal for broken bones, concussion etc. And no I am not not brining this up as a trivial point.

Best regards, Rik
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD." wrote:

Since 1994 = 16 years, to me, in my sense of time, it is a pretty extended period; no I do not have publications, only lots of personal cases and, I must repeat that, having been amazed by reading an almost mirror image of part of my practice in Tinus' book, with the difference of changing the potencies over the last 3 years. I have no financial or other interest in promoting his book, but as an aside, he describes in it cases of children whose mother's vaccines some time before conception, as well as drugs, were deemed be the cause of the autism, and he cleared it with the isopathic of the drug...............again, not a simillimum, not a repertorised prescription, but a removal of lingering cause. Worth a read, even just to know what the "Dark Side" does.......
I disagree about the soil upon which you fell: it is a passive recipient of your body; if anything should be potentised it would be "Gravity" (tongue in cheek, OK)........ But seriously, neither the bridge, nor the soil are causal factors in your broken bones, because they cannot be avoided, they are there as "innocent bystanders"; that you tripped on one and fell on the other is neither a cause of disease nor an obstacle to cure. It would be the same to say that if someone shoots at you, but you duck in time and another person behind you is killed, you are guilty of murder.
Now I think I should also clarify my way of practicing: people come to me for a medical/health consultation, not for a specific method of treatment. Every single patient is a blank sheet and it is during a lengthy (2 hours) consultation the the best approach for that individual person is determined and applied.
That I use homeopathy in the extreme majority of them is a fact; that I use other modalities, too; that I combine them, too. But as I wrote, the patient always knows exactly what I do, what he receives and why. It is Aphorism # 1: our mission is to cure............that is what I do; not always, but often enough.
Joe.
 
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
Visit my new website www.naturamedica.webs.com

In the cases that I know of lifestyle was very good and no vaccines but family history was always interesting but even if you spend hours looking for a needle in the haystack as to causation at the end of the day we go with the sx we have - and prescribe on sx similarity - why opt for that needle alone?

Joy

sent from my iphone

Isopathy is a "knock OFF" of Homeopathy.

I found a new homeopath for my family. He is an old guy and he's been practicing homeopathy maybe longer than most of you guys. He said using isopathy is last resort. He doesn't treat vaccine and he made a short comment that "constitutional remedy can solve the problem." It was pretty sufficient for me. I felt we are on the same page.
Pongo

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "RichardS" wrote:

My new homeopath doesn't mix with other modalities that is another reason I like him. He is capable of those things tho.

Pongo
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD." wrote:

take some arnica first and then philosophy a bit about why you tripped in the first place

good luck first of all

Roger

There you go.

You don't know how much you are hurting people. That's how you think when you see your patient. Automatically you make your patients guilty. I don't think all homeopaths are like you but I have a right to choose. You don't understand people that is a huge missing part as homeopath. You gave me prejudiced opinion that is another your tendency that I don't want either.

Pongo
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Roger Van Zandvoort wrote:

Oh! I almost forgot about you prescribed me Arnica without taking a case AGAIN!

Then, I prescribe for you veratrum Album because you have such a temper problem and religion(pseudo) insanity. You have to take every day until you get aggravation. I'm irresponsible about this and only I could know is from your response of remedy....

If I was homeopath, I would never ever prescribe any remedy on discussion web site but that's what you do and you think that is GOOOOOOOOOOOD!
Pongo

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Roger Van Zandvoort wrote:

Can I say Pongo that Roger wrote this Arnica for Riks very funny (joke) fall episode and the 'good luck' was for you probably - Roger is one of the gentlest people on the earth, he wouldn't say this to you. You've had some rough times so I thought some light shed might cheer you up

Joy

http://www.joylucashomeopathy.com
http://www.streetcollege.co.uk