Page 3 of 3
Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:30 pm
by Richard Nash- Shannon
Hello Shannon,
Just as an aside, sound, lengthy follow-up is a new thing for Scholten. In his earlier books there was a lot less of it. I was happy to see that he was persuaded to properly write up the cases in a format that should be equal in value to our evil counterparts.....the allopaths!
Best regards, Rik
--- In
minutus@yahoogroups.com, Shannon & Bob Nelson wrote:
Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:35 pm
by Richard Nash- Shannon
Hello Dale,
Yes I agree that perhaps it's best to save your sanity. But I will add that while the case was being read and analysed/reviewed, I did a full trituration of the inside of my cheek with my teeth grinding away in anger/disgust.
Best regards, Rik
--- In
minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dale Moss" wrote:
Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???
Posted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:33 pm
by Luise Kunkle
Hi Richard
As far as Scholten etc. are concerned, such peer review - when it does
occur - is at least not damned.
Peer review of "classical masters" is considered blasphemy!
Regards
Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========
Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:32 am
by Vera Resnick
In some circles, to say anything negative about Scholten or Sankaran puts you truly beyond the pale (I think that's where my homeopathic home is!). And when you talk about the Organon, you can see people's eyes glazing over. So peer review of the modern gurus is not as straightforward as it may seem...
Vera
Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:34 pm
by Paul Booyse
Hello Dale,
Ok, but how did the patient do?
regards,
Paul
Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:20 pm
by Richard Nash- Shannon
Hello Paul,
As there are never follow-ups available, if so rarely, then we never get to know.
On a related note, Dr Luc DeSchepper in his seminars is always doing live cases that everyone works on then has them back again so that these sorts of questions are answered.
Best regards, Rik
--- In
minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Booyse" wrote:
Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:06 pm
by Shannon Nelson
"Never follow-ups"? What circumstance are you talking about? Many
seminars and many books *do* give follow-ups, including e.g. Scholten's
Lanthanides book (great follow-up evaluation), all of Mangialavore's,
and many others. I agree that when follow-up is lacking, it's a severe
lack!
Shannon
Re: Sankaran, Scholten and others, was provings???
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:12 am
by Dale Moss
Not well. It was the wrong remedy. As I recall, the patient dropped out of treatment.
Peace,
Dale