Minutus

Ah yes - SO well said Dr Roz!
Thanks,
Irene.

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD,NMD. wrote:
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Richard Nash- Shannon wrote:

It's why I am a great believer in educating the public to look for some
appropriate credentials.
When we see a "doctor" we look for an MD, or the equivalent and when we
see a vet we look for "DVM" or equivalent.
So too does the *potential homeopathy consumer* have a responsibility to
look for credentials in all areas of professional advice they seek -
whether from a lawyer, or a homeopath, a Bach practitioner or a foprtune
teller. It's a case of "let the buyer beware".

As homeopaths, we can try to educate the public to look for credentials
and try to explain what they mean or do not mean. It's not easy to do
this - but it matters.

I see all the time how clients go to a "homeopathic veterinarian" whom
they trust to know what they are about - but who have not had more then
4 or 5 weekend seminars to "become homeopaths". The qualification they
allocate themselves for this varies, but usually it is CVH.
Whatever it is, the client CAN google it to see what it means - or
ask directly etc.

We just need to educate people that they need to know something about
the professional - either by looking into their credentials or by having
a good referral or any other reasonable method as is needed in any
profession where there is no licensing board.

We NEED a level of minimal proficiency in USA that clients can rely on -
just as "MD" or "DVM" tells them something. Some MD or DVM folks
graduated at the bottom of their class - but at least they graduated.
It's not a good thing that in USA there is no "sign of graduation"
for clients to look for to tell if they are seeing trained homeopath.
This is not THEIR fault!

But it is still their responsibility to look for a competent practitioner.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Luise Kunkle wrote:

Thanks - Useful to know!

Namaste,
Irene

--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Dear Rik

Were these guys trying a reproving of LUNAR?

Regards

Soroush

Proving can have this 'testing' meaning in English and perhaps it was more common then. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Bread is left to prove (i.e. to show the yeast is working). And we refer to 'proving grounds' meaning the area where the worth of something is tested.
Theresa
Luise wrote:
This is not so in the German word Hahnemann used. It is

Hello Soroush,
In some respects yes. Specifically they wanted the moons reflection off the water off the
shores of Gambier Island which was sacred to the native peoples who populated the area
long ago. Their plan was to float vials in the water in the reflection and then do a
meditative proving on the sands and rocks at the shore of the island............My next
proving will be of "Absolutely Ridiculous" 10M!

Best Regards, Rik
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Finrod" wrote:

Hello Joe,
Agree totally with you on this. With Sankarans approach one has a structered way of case taking and analysis which can be learned and can give excellent results. The only reservation I have is that anyone new to this approach should have the hard study under their belt and then study the newer system/s well. There is the danger of being too creative and getting completely lost, which Sankaran warns about. But by using the system, one can become more and more proficient.
Regards,
Paul

Hi Paul,
Could you or someone else give a concrete example why a therapist who
uses the Sankaran method exclusively should "have the hard study - of
the classical Hahnemannian approach - under their belt?

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Hello Luise,
A shortcut is only a shortcut if you are not lost in the forest. If you are
lost and it gets you to your destination then thats luck. OK let me not
sound like a tibetan monk. Firstly his approach is system and as such you
may end up with a choice of 2 or more remedies, and knowing the
characeteristics can help differentiate. knowing the basics also helps if
you get it wrong with his system (e.g. if you as practitioner make an error
of assessment).

As an example i ahd a case of a woman with social anxiety. Born with
cerebral palsy, she was anxious of she was in company and had to go down
stairs. With sankarans approach i have finally found a remedy that is
helping (so far). i had narrowed her down to a mineral at the early part of
the periodic table, in the carbon series, beginning stages. It was a toss up
between beryllium and borax. Nat mur had helped a bit (natrum) and her
anxiety was definitely worse going down stairs which clinched it for borax.

Regards,
paul

Hello Michael,
Well, if you read Luise's post, the question was specifically "'why do you need the H. knowledge (i.e. foundation)."
I know it's a keynote, but the rest of the case wouldn't have given you borax, i can assure you. I had seen her for about 10 months previously, giving other remedies, to no avail.
regards,
Paul