Page 3 of 4

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:25 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Okay, that's what I figured.
But I'm curious why one would give both the remedy and the drug--"an
excess of caution", or ?? Curious because in my experience so far, a
well-placed remedy works SO much faster and better than the equivalent
drug. (But maybe that's not always so, esp. if the remedy's potency is
not high enough?)
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:03 pm
by Pauline Ashford
Shannon I find that 'newbys' to Homeopathy will often use both (whether they
actually tell you or not!) until they have confidence that the Homeopathy
'actually does work' esp if they have a partner who is not into 'that weird
hippy s**t and exerting pressure'. It is only as they gain confidence and
convince their partners that they are happy to 'go it alone'. I never
castigate them, only educate them, as it would only serve to perhaps lose
them to Homeopathy. They have also been so 'marketed to' that they still
have the mindset that they are being unfair to let their child 'suffer so' -
it takes time and patience to undo this but the benefits are found in the
long term as they become advocates for Homeopathy and confident users of it.
Regards Pauline

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:58 pm
by Sheri Nakken
At 03:27 AM 10/9/2006 -0000, you wrote:

And how do you know they do not - there are many effects that are not
evident immediately.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:15 am
by muthu kumar
Sherri-

I agree with everything you are saying...

Allopathic drugs are bad bad bad anytime you take whatever the
circumstances

vaccination is the cardinal sin -
and the top of the list of Homepathic commandments - "Thou shall not
vaccinate thyself or thy neighbor"

There are no harmful microbes- all microbes are members of red cross,
green crescent, Boy and girl scouts etc. Microbes have been victimized
by the pharmaceutical industry and allopathic doctors just for selling
antibiotics and increasing clinic attendance...

Levity apart-

How do we know homeopathic drugs are not harmful? The side effects of
allopathy mostly is evident immediately because of the material doses
etc. How about homeopathy? Can't the harmful effects of homeopathy be
evident only 20 or so years later? How are we going to prove that our
drugs are really safe in the long run? Also if they can have side
effects cannot homeopathic drugs cause more pernicious damage because
of their subtle nature?

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:20 am
by Sheri Nakken
Fine
you win
going home and watch soap operas

At 02:15 AM 10/11/2006 -0000, you wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures@tesco.net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:30 am
by Luise Kunkle
Hi Sam's follower,
cut
Levity on:

How can you be so ignorant?

Of course homeopathic drugs are terribly harmful - the pernicious
effects of wrong treatments will show some time - it may be 60 years
later after seemingly perfect health in the meantime.

There is only one way to prevent that: you have to treat the right
way, and the right way is my way. Every other method will at best
palliate, at worst suppress.

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:38 pm
by Tanya Marquette
while your opinions are valuable, character assassination is not!

tanya
Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no
representations regarding the individual suitability of the information
contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which
appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire
risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall
the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct,
consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever
and howsoever caused.
your setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a
single daily digest.
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
your setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a
single daily digest.

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:13 pm
by Shannon Nelson
They're both just being silly...
:-)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:56 pm
by muthu kumar
Shannon-

Thanks for trying to save my face - but I was not being silly- I was
restating some one's position with great understanding and empathy ;-)
I do not see any character assassination anywhere in my posting as
well.( Nothing in my posting misstates any one's position).

I thought Tanya was really commenting about Luise's post.
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Robert & Shannon Nelson
wrote:
that
years
event

Re: Fevers [was: Interesting not-so-acute case

Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:11 am
by Tanya Marquette
YES, I WAS
I REALLY HAVE LITTLE PATIENCE FOR RUDNESS AND CHARACTER
ASSASSINATION.

TANYA
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
your setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a
single daily digest.