Re: 30C's
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 4:03 pm
Hi Dr. John,
Well, the action of a potentized remedy is quite a different thing from
the action of a chemical, or even from the action of something like
radiotherapy or radiation. Even tho the active "substance" of these
last two is non-material (as is the active "substance" in a remedy),
still it is acting on the gross, physical level of the body; it is
acting on the *material* of the body, and acting in a material way.
The action of a potentized remedy is different. Remedies act by
*stimulating the body's forces* to act, and they do so not by virtue of
their physical properties (which are only the physical properties of
sugar or etc.), but instead by virtue of their energetic effect *on the
life force* of the patient. Would you agree with this distinction?
The physical and chemical properties of drugs, radiation, radiowaves,
etc., are easy enough to quantify and regulate, and their effects on
physical and chemical systems and substances are reasonably constant
and predictable.
The physical and chemical effects of a remedy, OTOH, depend less upon
its own physical/chemical nature, and more upon its interaction with
the patient's "life force" (remedies have no effect upon corpses or
inanimate objects!). So the effect depends on a variety of factors,
including the state of the life force as well as other factors which
affect it, as well as the interplay between these and the energy of the
remedy--a vastly more complicated situation!
All of which is to my mind less important than the fact that: the
action of the remedy *does* vary as described; so spinning out theories
about "why" is pretty much just an intellectual exercise... Does that
make sense to you?
Best wishes,
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Well, the action of a potentized remedy is quite a different thing from
the action of a chemical, or even from the action of something like
radiotherapy or radiation. Even tho the active "substance" of these
last two is non-material (as is the active "substance" in a remedy),
still it is acting on the gross, physical level of the body; it is
acting on the *material* of the body, and acting in a material way.
The action of a potentized remedy is different. Remedies act by
*stimulating the body's forces* to act, and they do so not by virtue of
their physical properties (which are only the physical properties of
sugar or etc.), but instead by virtue of their energetic effect *on the
life force* of the patient. Would you agree with this distinction?
The physical and chemical properties of drugs, radiation, radiowaves,
etc., are easy enough to quantify and regulate, and their effects on
physical and chemical systems and substances are reasonably constant
and predictable.
The physical and chemical effects of a remedy, OTOH, depend less upon
its own physical/chemical nature, and more upon its interaction with
the patient's "life force" (remedies have no effect upon corpses or
inanimate objects!). So the effect depends on a variety of factors,
including the state of the life force as well as other factors which
affect it, as well as the interplay between these and the energy of the
remedy--a vastly more complicated situation!
All of which is to my mind less important than the fact that: the
action of the remedy *does* vary as described; so spinning out theories
about "why" is pretty much just an intellectual exercise... Does that
make sense to you?
Best wishes,
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]