Page 2 of 2

Re: pulsatilla

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 10:14 am
by Joy Lucas
That's even more confusing then. Can you say more please. I can't find
it in Phatak.

Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: pulsatilla

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:49 am
by Rochelle Marsden
On Isis I can see for each Rx in a rubric a number. I can then check up from the number to whom that remedy has been assigned to. Sorry I can't help more than that.

Rochelle

Re: pulsatilla

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 2:57 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Hi Joy,
What are you thinking about it?
Shannon

Re: pulsatilla

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:48 pm
by Gaby Rottler
Hi Joy,

Puls is in the 2nd grade in Schroyen's Synthesis:
HEAD - HAIR - falling - delivery - after

Source:
Boger/Boenninghausen's Characteristics

But when I check my Jain's ed., Puls is not listed there.....(perhaps
it's in the original ed. of Boger, but I don't know).
At least in the rubric 'hair' in vB's TPB it's not listed.

So may be this is just one of those numerous errors in our Reps....

Best,

Gaby

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gaby Rottler
Germany
rottler@curantur.de

http://www.curantur.de
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Re: pulsatilla

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:27 pm
by Joy Lucas
Thanks Gaby, but that's a specific for after giving birth, not
applicable in this case.

And Shannon asked what I was thinking about with this - it concerns me
that a reference in one system can be different in another and that
there is so little and unreliable information attached to some of these
'new' additions to the reps.

Much of my case points to Pulsatilla but I am just not convinced with
such flimsy additions which point to occasional clinical evidence
rather than definite proving sx.

I agree there are so many mistakes creeping into the reps these days.

Best wishes, Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: pulsatilla

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:48 pm
by Gaby Rottler
Hi Joy,
I jsut wanted to show: it's in a rubric, but that doesn't mean anything
till we confirmed it in the original sources. And if a symtpom can't be
found out (and the reliability of a source checked) then it simly isn't
worth anything.

Absolutely.

Too many - in my opinion. And fact is, the bigger these get, the more
people rely on them - because checking every symptom SEEMS to get too
difficult, too tedious, too boring, tooo...whatever.

At least in one of our German Journals there are always corrections for
our reps published (from few enthusiastic homoeopaths), but this is just
a 'drop on a hot stone' as a German proverb goes.

If you are looking for a similar remedy...have a look at Cyclamen: vB
lists it in his TPB in the 2nd grade in the rubric 'loss of hair, head'.

Best,

Gaby

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gaby Rottler
Germany
rottler@curantur.de

http://www.curantur.de
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~