Re: potency
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 7:00 pm
But, I was taught that in an acute disease with a strong, quick pacing
and strong, clear symptom picture, high potency is needed to match the
energy of the disease. And I have numerous times seen this approach
work very well. Wouldn't this also be a situation of "higher
susceptibility", or do I misunderstand that part?
In strong illness and severe injury, I have seen 30c repeatedly work
less well (not so completely and not so lastingly) than 200c or 1M. I
have not tried using e.g. 6c and e.g. 1M on the same injury or illness;
maybe at some point I will be able to compare that directly.
It seems that this is another area where there are numerous
possibilities...??
Best,
Shannon
and strong, clear symptom picture, high potency is needed to match the
energy of the disease. And I have numerous times seen this approach
work very well. Wouldn't this also be a situation of "higher
susceptibility", or do I misunderstand that part?
In strong illness and severe injury, I have seen 30c repeatedly work
less well (not so completely and not so lastingly) than 200c or 1M. I
have not tried using e.g. 6c and e.g. 1M on the same injury or illness;
maybe at some point I will be able to compare that directly.
It seems that this is another area where there are numerous
possibilities...??
Best,
Shannon