Page 2 of 2

Re: Saccharum officinale

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:06 am
by dusty1197
Thank you, Jean. 30C is where I'd like to start. I see a Carc
similarity in the deep attachment to others, but the compensation,
or lack thereof, is a good differentiating feature. I'll let you
know how the case progresses.

Toni

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Jean Doherty wrote:
positive
Uses
Smits.
Carcinosum.
when do
with
with
Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no
representations regarding the individual suitability of the
information contained in any document read or advice or
recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email
postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use
remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or
its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and
howsoever caused.
with the subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@y... to receive a
single daily digest.

Re: Saccharum officinale

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:11 am
by dusty1197
I'm up to date, Patti. I've just reopened the program and am now
getting 300 symptoms. I'm in the ballpark, anyway :)) I'll contact
you privately if I can't figure it out. Thanks, Patti!

Toni

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Patti Mount" wrote:
might
by
single
what

Re: Saccharum officinale

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:31 pm
by Dale Moss
Weirder yet, I have RADAR 8, which gave me 859 rubrics!

Peace,
Cinnabar

Re: Saccharum officinale

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:34 pm
by dusty1197
Oh, good grief! LOL! Maybe I should trade down my version ;-) I'm
still at 300; at least that's an improvement over the original 184!

Regards,
Toni
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "DMH" wrote:
by
single
what
not