Re: Dyspraxia Case
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:33 pm
on 11/11/04 15:13, indu masoor at indu_masoor@yahoo.com wrote:
J Lucas,
I would suggest to refere Aphorisms162 to170.Most of this type of congenital
cases does not fit into one single simillimum.These are all one sided
Diseases.What ever symptoms ,mental- physical symptoms are depend on -ONE
cause ie congenital.Normal at birth ,itself is ABNORMAL. Most of time U may
have to treat on miasmatic basis depending on Family history alone .And
improvement will not be fast .Improvement comes along with growth of
individual.Deapth of disease deepest.Normal polycrests will not be able to
change any way.,if at all any change ,will not hold on .I have seen number
of cases tried on available symptoms with out considering deapth of disease
by other Homoeopaths,failed not only homoeopaths but homoeopathy itself.
I dont know what is Ur experience in treating this type of cases,but with
grace of GOD ,
I have treated number of cases of Cerebral Palsy,ADHDs,Mentally backward
children,Autistic chldren quite success fully.
***Me too and without the grace of god - just homeopathy. I believe in
prescribing the simillimum for the indicating sx, at any given time in a
case regardless of what that remedy might be and how deep the case is.
Even in so called one sided cases there will be characteristic sx if you
look hard enough.
All rx have a miasmatic influence this doesn't mean to say you can ONLY
prescribe nosodes in cases of dyspraxia for example.
Even Hahnemann said that one sided diseases are quite rare and that finding
a suitable remedy can be a problem because of the too few number of
medicines yet known to us.
"Normal at birth, itself is ABNORMAL" - what does this mean?
Best, Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
J Lucas wrote:
It is never wise to prescribe on theory like this - the only way is to
prescribe on the indicating symptoms and if there is only ever one single
simillimum (how could there be more than one?) then so be it, however deep
seated it may be.
Encouraging routine prescribing on 'types' of cases is misleading and
unnecessary.
Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
J Lucas,
I would suggest to refere Aphorisms162 to170.Most of this type of congenital
cases does not fit into one single simillimum.These are all one sided
Diseases.What ever symptoms ,mental- physical symptoms are depend on -ONE
cause ie congenital.Normal at birth ,itself is ABNORMAL. Most of time U may
have to treat on miasmatic basis depending on Family history alone .And
improvement will not be fast .Improvement comes along with growth of
individual.Deapth of disease deepest.Normal polycrests will not be able to
change any way.,if at all any change ,will not hold on .I have seen number
of cases tried on available symptoms with out considering deapth of disease
by other Homoeopaths,failed not only homoeopaths but homoeopathy itself.
I dont know what is Ur experience in treating this type of cases,but with
grace of GOD ,
I have treated number of cases of Cerebral Palsy,ADHDs,Mentally backward
children,Autistic chldren quite success fully.
***Me too and without the grace of god - just homeopathy. I believe in
prescribing the simillimum for the indicating sx, at any given time in a
case regardless of what that remedy might be and how deep the case is.
Even in so called one sided cases there will be characteristic sx if you
look hard enough.
All rx have a miasmatic influence this doesn't mean to say you can ONLY
prescribe nosodes in cases of dyspraxia for example.
Even Hahnemann said that one sided diseases are quite rare and that finding
a suitable remedy can be a problem because of the too few number of
medicines yet known to us.
"Normal at birth, itself is ABNORMAL" - what does this mean?
Best, Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
J Lucas wrote:
It is never wise to prescribe on theory like this - the only way is to
prescribe on the indicating symptoms and if there is only ever one single
simillimum (how could there be more than one?) then so be it, however deep
seated it may be.
Encouraging routine prescribing on 'types' of cases is misleading and
unnecessary.
Joy
http://www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com