Re: Low potencies
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2003 9:14 am
Hi Jeff,
(Sorry for my delay!)
Thanks for this explanation. Could I ask how long your experience has been
with this approach -- low Cs and/or LMs repeated so frequently -- on chronic
conditions? I'm curious whether, in your and/or his experience, there winds
up being no need of using high potencies "ever", or whether it's beneficial
at some point (when the patient has stabilized?) to follow up with a high
potency?
I'm also curious about the idea of repeat an LM more than daily. I did work
briefly with a h'th who suggested this, and did it myself with no problem --
but it turned out the rx was wrong anyway, so... But overall my experience
with LMs is not much, but I was greatly helped by following David Little's
suggestions to repeat the dose only when *needed*, according to return of
symptoms. However, I made this change at the same time as I reduced the
size of dose (in my then-toddler son) by about 3/4; never tried using the
reduced dosage on a daily (or more) repetition, so maybe there would have
been no more aggravations once the size of dose was more appropriate.
I'm just curious whether, in your (and others') experience the more frequent
repetition (e.g. more than daily) does in fact speed the cure?
Would this approach be more apt to suit a case where there are many chronic
problems but the "overall constitutional" is elusive, or not really...
Thanks,
Shannon
on 12/16/02 9:52 AM, Jeff Sutherland at
jeff.sutherland@spamcop.net wrote:
(Sorry for my delay!)
Thanks for this explanation. Could I ask how long your experience has been
with this approach -- low Cs and/or LMs repeated so frequently -- on chronic
conditions? I'm curious whether, in your and/or his experience, there winds
up being no need of using high potencies "ever", or whether it's beneficial
at some point (when the patient has stabilized?) to follow up with a high
potency?
I'm also curious about the idea of repeat an LM more than daily. I did work
briefly with a h'th who suggested this, and did it myself with no problem --
but it turned out the rx was wrong anyway, so... But overall my experience
with LMs is not much, but I was greatly helped by following David Little's
suggestions to repeat the dose only when *needed*, according to return of
symptoms. However, I made this change at the same time as I reduced the
size of dose (in my then-toddler son) by about 3/4; never tried using the
reduced dosage on a daily (or more) repetition, so maybe there would have
been no more aggravations once the size of dose was more appropriate.
I'm just curious whether, in your (and others') experience the more frequent
repetition (e.g. more than daily) does in fact speed the cure?
Would this approach be more apt to suit a case where there are many chronic
problems but the "overall constitutional" is elusive, or not really...
Thanks,
Shannon
on 12/16/02 9:52 AM, Jeff Sutherland at
jeff.sutherland@spamcop.net wrote: