Re: post traumatic stress
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 11:15 pm
irrelevant
twaddle
subjective
psychobabble.
"sparked an ignition"
hmm..
I think that Joy's out-of-hand rigidly judgemental dismissal of my input is
fascinatingly out-of-character! =;->)
I had hoped that the input I gave, which is based upon a fair amount of
interaction with several fellas suffering mightily with PTSD might mean
something to someone. I imagine it has, beyond the fact that it seems to
have exposed some obviously sensitive area in the normally objective Joy.
I imagine that there are some who have "ears to hear" ... what is based in
experience - as opposed to being subjective. (irrelevant, twaddle, etc.)
At least we agree that it is a case of some magnitude and that there is some
reason to use the word danger; perhaps
It is irrelevant in this case, to consider "taciturn."
"Indisposition to speak" is also irrelavant - look for unusual symptoms,
not common generals.
It is absolutely, utterly common for "war wounded" PTSD sufferers (among
others) to have difficulty speaking of the trauma.
The *failure* of the homeopath to utilize homeopathic psychology; to be
flexible and be able -as opposed to "identifying with the client's
nsanity" -to see that insanity & sanity are points along a continuum...
are hopefully not the final end point of that homeopath's mental & spiritual
development -but ARE a *dangerous* precipice with regard to
treatment!
To use the rubrics "taciturn" and "indisposition to speak" in this case, are
merely admission of incompetence in taking this case, imho.
If you can't get beyond that, refer the case!
If you think it "twaddle" that such an individual could become dangerous -
you need your head examined
regards,
Dave Hartley
www.localcomputermart.com/dave
Santa Cruz, CA (831)423-4284
twaddle
subjective
psychobabble.
"sparked an ignition"
hmm..
I think that Joy's out-of-hand rigidly judgemental dismissal of my input is
fascinatingly out-of-character! =;->)
I had hoped that the input I gave, which is based upon a fair amount of
interaction with several fellas suffering mightily with PTSD might mean
something to someone. I imagine it has, beyond the fact that it seems to
have exposed some obviously sensitive area in the normally objective Joy.
I imagine that there are some who have "ears to hear" ... what is based in
experience - as opposed to being subjective. (irrelevant, twaddle, etc.)
At least we agree that it is a case of some magnitude and that there is some
reason to use the word danger; perhaps
It is irrelevant in this case, to consider "taciturn."
"Indisposition to speak" is also irrelavant - look for unusual symptoms,
not common generals.
It is absolutely, utterly common for "war wounded" PTSD sufferers (among
others) to have difficulty speaking of the trauma.
The *failure* of the homeopath to utilize homeopathic psychology; to be
flexible and be able -as opposed to "identifying with the client's
nsanity" -to see that insanity & sanity are points along a continuum...
are hopefully not the final end point of that homeopath's mental & spiritual
development -but ARE a *dangerous* precipice with regard to
treatment!
To use the rubrics "taciturn" and "indisposition to speak" in this case, are
merely admission of incompetence in taking this case, imho.
If you can't get beyond that, refer the case!
If you think it "twaddle" that such an individual could become dangerous -
you need your head examined
regards,
Dave Hartley
www.localcomputermart.com/dave
Santa Cruz, CA (831)423-4284