Minutus

Hi Sheila,
I didn't know that. Is he a medical practitioner as well?
Sue

i just learned last week that scholten is a

Dear Joy,
I know what you mean. I think we do need new remedies but not added in this
way. Sue
and
all
homoeopathy -
of
If
dolphins",
I
it
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
subject of 'Digest' to ashahrdar@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.

Dear Felipe, Joy and all,

It would be more rational to be proving indigenous remedies that have
proven themselves in practice over generations to be useful for curing some
of the big diseases of our time (psychiatric problems included but not
exclusively).
Sue

The more recent proving of Clay was completed by Madeline Evans as a
meditative proving and is available in her book 'Meditative Provings'. I am
sure that someone will have a copy and be able to scan the details and send
them to you.

Best wishes
jean

Hi Rochelle,

2 issues - we really shouldn't be promoting remedies in this way "suitable
for children with Down Syndrome" etc. I have a little boy with Down Syndrome
and he is Phosphorous!!

And please it really should be "a child with Down Syndrome" or " a man with
Down Syndrome" etc NOT Down Syndrome child - we are people first.

With best wishes, Joy
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

no the rx prescribed was 'clay' and i was led to believe this was not
'alumina' as surely it would be called just that?? the hom would not be
'tricking' me with the rx name. I have no concerns re the prescription - i
just like to know about a rx when i haven't learnt/prescribed it myself.
Janice
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

taa rochelle, janice
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

natasha - 'replied' to your earlier mail before I read this one. The Hom we
see tends to use a lot of newer rx (ie. rx that I wasn't taught and are not
in the usual MM or Rep) alongside the 'normal'. Next time I go I will jot
down the name of his MM. I presume it is called Clay as thats what it is and
the Alumina is only known as that (I didnt realise that it was clay per se)-
we live and learn!!!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

sue, hi. he is also a psychologist. a few other things, also. but i forget
what. the psychologist part of it made sense to me in all the
theorizing/analyzing he does about the remedies. i have already stated that
i disagree with a lot of it. does anyone else know what else he is?
thanks, sheila
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com

Joy wrote:
all
homoeopathy -

Yes, I have some problems with that approach - Madeleine Evans uses it a
lot, and without the nitty gritty details of the provings to back it up you
either have to take her word for it or ignore the remedy. We all know from
college days how easy it is to see any remedy we're studying in a case
(especially our own)! I really wish she'd published fuller information as
the remedies look very interesting, but as it stands it's simply not
enough - her book is certainly not the best £35 I've ever spent. But it's by
no means the case for many of the new remedies - you'd be hard pressed to
fault Jeremy Sherr's provings, for instance.

I do think that these new provings are a wonderful addition to homeopathy
and I don't think there's any need to feel swamped by them. We can never
know every remedy in the materia medica intimately enough to recognise it in
an instant - we just need to know what we need do to go about finding it. If
you trust that the process will reveal the remedy to you, it usually does.
Just take what you're interested in and leave what you're not.

Our world is changing fast and the disease "syndromes" that are now being
defined in ever-increasing numbers don't always seem so amenable to the old
"traditional" remedies. A lot of zig-zagging seems called for - so perhaps
the new remedies will be able to short-cut that process.

There's also a perspective from many of the shamanic traditions that says
that the medicine you need is all around you in your immediate environment.
For those who's environment has become almost totally
artificial/techological, many of these new remedies will likely prove
extremely useful.

Regards
Wendy