Re: Remedy lifetime
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2002 3:35 am
Hi Shannon,
"most cases" assessed according to "probability" do fall within a sort of
Bell Curve distribution in the 1:1000 sensitivity range, with 1 and 1000
being quite extreme.
Nevertheless, what is important, as always in homeopathy, is knowing that we
are dealing with an INDIVIDUAL, not a statistical likelihood.
In order to avoid the occasional annoying aggravations that you've
witnessed, as well as the one or two terrible ones, it is necessary to put
to rest the erroneous ideas concerning size of dose.
If one person in 1000 is so sensitive that what would "probably" be a minor
aggravation at most for "most" of the others.. would, for this one person be
a life-threatening situation... don't we have the stringent obligation of
knowing this, and if we haven't seen evidence of this.. at least to open
our minds, eyes, and ears (perhaps even heart) when others report their
experience?
For that 1 (or more accurately, perhaps 50) out of 1000 persons who are so
sensitive that my or your "minor aggravation" could be untold misery.. we
must ethically & morally take responsibility for carefully following the
founding dictum of homeopathy which states:
similia minimus, minimum dose of homeopathic remedy.
Better to err on the side of caution than to make excuses based on
statistical probability after thoughtlessly creating the one in 1,000
deathly aggravation, don't you think?
regards,
Dave Hartley
www.localcomputermart.com/dave
Santa Cruz, CA (831)423-4284
"most cases" assessed according to "probability" do fall within a sort of
Bell Curve distribution in the 1:1000 sensitivity range, with 1 and 1000
being quite extreme.
Nevertheless, what is important, as always in homeopathy, is knowing that we
are dealing with an INDIVIDUAL, not a statistical likelihood.
In order to avoid the occasional annoying aggravations that you've
witnessed, as well as the one or two terrible ones, it is necessary to put
to rest the erroneous ideas concerning size of dose.
If one person in 1000 is so sensitive that what would "probably" be a minor
aggravation at most for "most" of the others.. would, for this one person be
a life-threatening situation... don't we have the stringent obligation of
knowing this, and if we haven't seen evidence of this.. at least to open
our minds, eyes, and ears (perhaps even heart) when others report their
experience?
For that 1 (or more accurately, perhaps 50) out of 1000 persons who are so
sensitive that my or your "minor aggravation" could be untold misery.. we
must ethically & morally take responsibility for carefully following the
founding dictum of homeopathy which states:
similia minimus, minimum dose of homeopathic remedy.
Better to err on the side of caution than to make excuses based on
statistical probability after thoughtlessly creating the one in 1,000
deathly aggravation, don't you think?
regards,
Dave Hartley
www.localcomputermart.com/dave
Santa Cruz, CA (831)423-4284