Lunar Eclipse, Themes

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

Varun

I find this totally incomprehensible and unscientific.

Homeopathy’s strong base is its SCIENTIFIC proving method for remedies as described fully by Hahnemann in the Organon – this allows us to use the principle of Like CURES like.
If the scientific basis for our remedies gets diluted in any shape or form, then homeopathy is diluted and open to ridicule.
And by the description you have given, this process is not reproducible and that is another reason why it is not ‘scientific’.
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 10:05 AM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Lunar Eclipse, Themes
Yes, it's not easy I understand. Though, for this remedy, instead of just using radionics, it was done as a kind of recording, to capture the eclipse energies from even the atmosphere in a way. Thus, two differences than the general radionics approach. First, it was done right at the time of Eclipse, and second, it was to capture eclipse energies in atmosphere too. Still, as we generally may feel difficult to trust on radionics, the situation may not seem fully convincing.
Here are some words from Michael Leger himself, from Homeodynamics. "I decided that the best method to capture its energy signature was to use a Large Radionic Instrument as a type of recording device. I began the recording by verbally stating and physically writing my intent to capture the energy of the lunar eclipse at 11am on the 24th of May, 2013. This was the beginning of the ‘black out’ period, the period twelve hours before the maximum eclipse. The maximum of the eclipse was at 11pm. It was also a ‘super moon’ - the moon was in perigee. Perigee occurred at noon on the 25th. I ended the recording at 9pm on the 25th, at the approximate end of the black-out period.
If we trust radionics, then this new way to use it right at the time of Eclipse, may feel properly convincing. Otherwise, doubts certainly will linger.
Also, if we would use the remedy, when due to symptoms one feels convinced to use this remedy, whether on the basis of themes given, or otherwise, the correct working of the remedy will provide the needed proof. Here too we can say how one would reach on the remedy, but we do somehow, like even for other remedies, when enough symptoms are not written. These medicines are used less, but we still get to them. Sometimes, the prescription is wrong, and that's another issue. Still, the right working of the remedy has ways to stand out, and that then gives the needed proof.
Varun
Varun,

I agree with Soroush.

The information provided is very confusing.

Atb,

Leilanae

[John Benneth]

tres interressant