Page 2 of 2

Re: a sticky prescribing problem

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:04 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Thanks Joe,
Yes, that makes sense to me -- and I'm realizing I need to get more details from her. Nat-m was and is a really easy "to-go" for her situation, and there it was covering her other symptoms so neatly -- but I'm guessing now that I need to flesh out some "details' with her, and question some of the assumptions that I'm not realizing I was making.
Thanks for the thoughts.
________________________________

From: "'Dr. J Rozencwajg, NMD' jroz@ihug.co.nz [minutus]"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 4:24:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] a sticky prescribing problem
I would be very careful....is there another way to approach the case, leading to another remedy, related but different?

From what I read, as I never experienced that situation personally, this can happen when the remedy is close but no cigar, more remedy choice than potency....

Joe,
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.

"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"

www.naturamedica.co.nz

Re: a sticky prescribing problem

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:06 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Actually if I'm remembering right, Nat-m does cover convulsions also, including the specifics of those she had had.

But... Well, I'll explore more, including Ignatia.

Thanks!
________________________________

From: "'DALE MOSS' dale.moss@verizon.net [minutus]"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 4:51:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] a sticky prescribing problem


Looks like Nat-m. but has convulsions... have you considered Ignatia?
Peace,
Dale