Minutus

I agree with both of you here and although I generally don't get involved in these conversations, I have a great respect for both of you and many of the folk on this site. For what its worth I have found communication on the net leaves a lot to be desired in any forum. It seems that we humans need to not only have along with the spoken word, but also need to often hear the voice tone and see the other's body language to fully interpret and understand what that person is trying to communicate. Unfortunately, it only takes one first sentence to be misinterpreted to trigger things off in the wrong direction. There have been more than enough times that I have found that just seeing words on a paper or a screen can lead me into a misinterpretation of what the other party is a trying to communicate. Thats where a : >) often helps.

bob

Here it is, from the Ebola thread John started yesterday:
But the discussion has moved away from the comments I made in response to it.
Sorry Irene, I can't respond to this as it is a different discussion about statements and suggestions I didn't make so perhaps it should be a new topic that others may like to take up?

Fran.

Dear Fran,
What John said is correct.

He did not mention antibodies however, it was only your email that did that, and which caused the disagreement or confusion.

We can just drop that as antibodies do not have a place in it?

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."