The History of Homeopathy

[Irene de Villiers]

It's not personal really - it is an attack on all vet homeopaths as mine is the frst test case to set precedent in vet hom. If I lose, ALL veterinary homeopaths lost.
There are eight companies in cahoots with AVMA to fund it.
It started about 1996 after the publication of facts showing that Americans spend more money on alternatve health than on vets. So it was decided to so a 2 million or billion dollar study (I forget which and do not have the downloads any more) done by Hills Science Diet and Bayer, with the agreement by AVMA that vets (who are coerced to join AVMA) would carry their Hills/Bayer products in return for them doing a study on how to shut down the competition from alternative health.
The conclusion of the study was that thtey needed to change the state laws about veterinary medicine to make it look to legislators that the changes were safety related, but in practice to rewrite the laws and lobby them into action, to exclude any possibility of alternative health folks staying in business.
To this end they came up with a "Model VeterinaryMedicine Practice Act". At this point eight companies became involved, (food and drug companies, again with AVMA agreement to carry ONLY those 8 companies' drugs and foods at vet clinics) in order to cover all the lobbying needed to change laws in fifty separate states.

THe laws have been duly changed into draconian messups. For example they added terms like that an animal has to be seen in a surgery equipped "properly" (defined as with xray equipment, surgery equipment, a proper pharmacy etc etc) .......

Just read the crazy new laws yourself if you want to see.
This way, they decided they can either accuse vets of practicing outside the area of their vet training (hence they just sued a California vet and won becasue he was telling his client how to use homeopahty on her cat) and if someone has no license then they sue you for practicing medicine wihtout a license.
No you are totally wrong - homeopathy is highly desired, and the drug companies and vets are running scared as their inome already HALVED in 1996 and they are (were) under threat of goingout of business and not having money for yachts, fancy homes etc.
Just yesterday a cat owner wrote to me to say she had spent $2200 on "diagnosis". This icluded eplortory surgery on a very ill cat. All they needed was a $100 of blood tests. But the latest approach is to do every teat they can dupe the client into paying for.

The case I am in court for involves no money asked or received by me, (unless you believe the lies the AAG invented) but the first of two vets had already charged over 8 thousand dollars with a wrong diagnosis - followed by a correct diagnosis by a 2nd vet for? more dollars....soon after which the cat died.
I had offered homeopathy help but it was declined. Now I am being called a charlatan, taking advantage of people with a very sick cat and overcarging them and using my computer as a medical device to put the people of WA state at risk by sending an email to CA duplicating my website information on the website in India - except the judge judged that it was in WA, (so that they could say I was practicing medicine in WA) and called it an "undisputed fact". They also called it an "undisputed fact" that I charged several hundred dollars for a remedy (none was offered nor sent - hundreds??? for one remedy??? confusing it with allopathy?).

The point is they had a long list (126 pages) of "undiputed findings of fact" not one of which was true and not one of which had evidence to support it (just the oposite) - every one of them disputed vehemently with good solid evidence that it was untrue. (Dunno why I even mailed any answers, they were ignored.
A real kangaroo court.)
All to stop my "potential" for competing for dollars vets are supposed to have.

But it is NOT that homeopathy has failed - it is that it has been shown to be too good - and to be competition for DOLLARS. Vets and drug companies especially make their bread and butter from vaccines. Homeopaths are quick to undo that trend. That's trillions of dollars at stake per year...... SCARY if your trillions are threatened?

I was supposedly found guilty of making money by treating a cat and sending a very expensive remedy.
Nothing could be further from the truth but the point is they will stomp out homeopaths no matter what the truth is. The pack of lies is all they could invent, I had been super careful not to stick a toe over the stupid line. It does NOT matter - they WILL stop all homeopaths - they do not care how. Truth has no place in it.
Nobody is turned off homeopathy - except 8 companies and AVMA - who dislike the competition

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

[Maria Bohle]

Big Pharma relies on big bucks for Rx meds. In India the people cannot pay that, homeopathy is pretty cheap, and even then it is above the ability of people to pay for.

When my husband was ill and his vital force had crashed, the allo doc gave him an Rx for a steroid nebulizer, I went to try to fill the rx and they wanted almost $800.00 for a month's supply, at two neb treatments a day.

I was able to buy the steroid nebs from Bangladesh for $99.00 (if I had spent $100.00 on the rx, it would have been free shipping.) Husband had one neb treatment with those steroids, and that was it. Yes, it seemed to over ride his body, but the vital force had no more energy and he passed gently and blessedly. He was free of allopathic meds, except for structural damage that caused him a lot of physical pain, until two weeks before the end.

With those kinds of prices, the pharmaceutical companies have lots of money to throw around against homeopathy, so do the pharmacies whom I am sure share in those profits, etc, etc.

Warmly, Maria
________________________________

[Dana Ullman, MPH]

Friends,

There were MANY reasons that homeopathy diminished, while allopathy flourished.

When I was doing historical research while I was writing my previous book, THE HOMEOPATHIC REVOLUTION, I uncovered some important information that clearly and easily explains how and why the AMA got rich and powerful.

People interested in this issue will benefit from reading this short article I wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/story/81659/how ... n_got_rich

There is always a tendency for a minority school of thought to blame themselves for problems, when, in fact, I personally point my finger at the financial resources that the allopaths were able to accrue...and to the combined influence of the drug companies and the doctors.

Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH
www.homeopathic.com

[Roger B]

Perhaps you are not getting my perspective, Irene. I am talking about American homeopathy as a whole for the past 120 years, just about exactly how long the processed food tsunami has been rising. I could knock on my neighbors doors now; I could go up and down the street doing that, sort of like Halloween, and I could ask them if they had ever heard of homeopathy. NOT one single person would know what I was talking about. NOT ONE. But I worked closely with a few Europeans in the 1980's and 1990's when I was a software engineer. All knew what homeopathy was and many liked it. American homeopathy has been in decline for the past 120 years. When I got turned on to homeopathy in 1969, there were only 4 homeopathic physicians in the entire San Francisco Bay Area. 3 were in their 90's (a very good testimonial for homeopathy, but no one noticed) and one was 56 years old. Homeopathy almost died in America, I guess until people started to notice that allopathy didn't work and our food system was sick.

Roger Bird
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:38:14 -0800
Subject: Re: [Minutus] The History of Homeopathy
No you are totally wrong - homeopathy is highly desired, and the drug companies and vets are running scared as their inome already HALVED in 1996 and they are (were) under threat of goingout of business and not having money for yachts, fancy homes etc.
Just yesterday a cat owner wrote to me to say she had spent $2200 on "diagnosis". This icluded eplortory surgery on a very ill cat. All they needed was a $100 of blood tests. But the latest approach is to do every teat they can dupe the client into paying for.

The case I am in court for involves no money asked or received by me, (unless you believe the lies the AAG invented) but the first of two vets had already charged over 8 thousand dollars with a wrong diagnosis - followed by a correct diagnosis by a 2nd vet for? more dollars....soon after which the cat died.
I had offered homeopathy help but it was declined. Now I am being called a charlatan, taking advantage of people with a very sick cat and overcarging them and using my computer as a medical device to put the people of WA state at risk by sending an email to CA duplicating my website information on the website in India - except the judge judged that it was in WA, (so that they could say I was practicing medicine in WA) and called it an "undisputed fact". They also called it an "undisputed fact" that I charged several hundred dollars for a remedy (none was offered nor sent - hundreds??? for one remedy??? confusing it with allopathy?).

The point is they had a long list (126 pages) of "undiputed findings of fact" not one of which was true and not one of which had evidence to support it (just the oposite) - every one of them disputed vehemently with good solid evidence that it was untrue. (Dunno why I even mailed any answers, they were ignored.
A real kangaroo court.)
All to stop my "potential" for competing for dollars vets are supposed to have.

But it is NOT that homeopathy has failed - it is that it has been shown to be too good - and to be competition for DOLLARS. Vets and drug companies especially make their bread and butter from vaccines. Homeopaths are quick to undo that trend. That's trillions of dollars at stake per year...... SCARY if your trillions are threatened?

I was supposedly found guilty of making money by treating a cat and sending a very expensive remedy.
Nothing could be further from the truth but the point is they will stomp out homeopaths no matter what the truth is. The pack of lies is all they could invent, I had been super careful not to stick a toe over the stupid line. It does NOT matter - they WILL stop all homeopaths - they do not care how. Truth has no place in it.
Nobody is turned off homeopathy - except 8 companies and AVMA - who dislike the competition

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

[Irene de Villiers]

Hi Roger, I do realize that, but the decline is not about the junkfood it is about the American Medical Association (and AVMA on the vet side) activiely killing it, intentionally and with malice of forethought.

Here's a summary so I do not need to rewrite one:
(What I wrote previously was just the latest iteration of that concerted homeopathy killing process by the western medicine people, started by AMA and led by Big Pharma, more than 120 yrs ago.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

[Tanya Marquette]

Indeed Dana. I did a deep study of the history of women in medicine back int he 1970’s and came across this information
on how the AMA developed its political legs. Thank you David Rockefeller’s infusion of money. However, the people who
claimed control were marketing people who trashed homeopathy and pushed chemistry. There strategy was to destroy
all eclectic healing and push everything towards chemicals. Doctors were threatened if they even mentioned homeopathy
much less include it in their practice. The floundering profession acceded to these demands due to the money going into
branding of the industry which promised trade support and great increase in profits. The strategy worked.

t

[Roger B]

I have no problem with what you just said there, Dana Ullman. But I insist that the tsunami of the "Twinkie" cuisine played a major roll. People wanting instantaneous gratification also played a central roll. The rise of physics and chemistry also made people doubt that there was anything in the remedies. Shallowness of thought also doesn't help homeopathy, but that may have been a constant all along.

Roger Bird
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:48:47 -0800
Subject: [Minutus] Re: The History of Homeopathy

Friends,

There were MANY reasons that homeopathy diminished, while allopathy flourished.

When I was doing historical research while I was writing my previous book, THE HOMEOPATHIC REVOLUTION, I uncovered some important information that clearly and easily explains how and why the AMA got rich and powerful.

People interested in this issue will benefit from reading this short article I wrote:
http://www.alternet.org/story/81659/how ... n_got_rich

There is always a tendency for a minority school of thought to blame themselves for problems, when, in fact, I personally point my finger at the financial resources that the allopaths were able to accrue...and to the combined influence of the drug companies and the doctors.

Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH
www.homeopathic.com