Basically, what you and others are saying is that the only valid perspective on the reason that homeopathy declined is the perspective of the practitioner of homeopathy, NOT the perspective of the patient or society at large. Believe it or not, patients and common folk also have a perspective. And I am saying that this perspective of the patient is also important for the decline in homeopathy, that the impact of fake-foods clouded their perception and made it difficult if not impossible for them to see any results; consequently they had no enthusiasm for homeopathy to pass on to other people.
Your profession lives and dies based upon customers. If you have no customers, you have no profession. If your customers don't get a benefit from homeopathy, they will NOT garner new customers for you. I have had many failures of homeopathy, but my first experience was spectacular, so I kept the faith. But I bet that many of my failures were the result of too many carbs and sugar.
Roger Bird
________________________________
To:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
From:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 05:28:07 -0800
Subject: Re: [Minutus] History of Homeopathy - more on Decline of Homeopathy in US
Yes - but you shoud select whom you consider an authority very carefully

A PhD can be a really good qualification or it can stand for piled higher and deeper.
YOU need to figure which it is. You also need the qualification to be in the right field. A PhD in Theology is not so great for someone selling diet books, unless they expect the bible itself to become breakfast cereal with insense as desert.
That is not in dispute,
What is in dispute is that this has anything to do with the low current use of homeopathy in USA.
No.
There is no homeopath who skips Hahnemann's assertion to remove maintaining cause.
You will get that for some fly by night peple, not any trained homeopath.
Here too the AVMA and AMA and Big Pharma are at pains to spread around any incident as you describe so it sounds in the media like a normal frequent event.
It is not.
They are also at pains to allow anyone to call themsleves a homeopath in USA - so t6hey can j umpo on the unetica ones who do so and publicize that ALL homeopahty is that way.
You are (no offence intended) being a sucker for that:-(
Not just anyone can call themseves a vet, but my cat could hang up a shingle quite legally, as a homeopath.
AS a consumer - LOOK for the D.I Vet or D.Vet Hom or some such qualification.
It is rare and occurs with those wihtout proper training in homeopathy -
it is common in the vet profession however.
In vethom it occurs now and then with vets who have that four or five weekend course by someone with zero homeopahty credentials - but it occurs DAILY with vets who do not know their allopathic job and canm;t even read a blood test much less know when to order one.
YOu have it backwards as to where the ripoffs are happening.
Old ones too.
I learned from one such.
ANY trained homeopath has that approach - at any generation since Hahnemann.
Sorry but you do have it backwards.
In addition, a good remedy will help with the diet compliance:-)
Oh thou of little faith and too much exposure to propaganda against homeopathy.
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."