Page 2 of 2
Re: Wikipedia and Homeopathy
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:39 pm
by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
And the "exact" sciences like maths, chemistry are pretty correct...after all they are not really open to discussion and interpretation, except in the upper levels of new discoveries.
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
Re: Wikipedia and Homeopathy
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2014 3:58 pm
by Maria Bohle
Yes, depending (As Dr. Roz said) on what they are defining, finite science sure, controversial items - not so much. Some of their bibliographies are priceless as long as we discriminate on what we are reading.
Maria
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
Re: Wikipedia and Homeopathy
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:40 am
by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
That is valid for anything one is using BTW.
As far as I am concerned, anything I read that has importance and relevance, I try to double check it, I almost never accept the fact that someone, no matter who it is, said or wrote something as the pure and unadulterated truth...this might seem arrogant at first sight, I realise that....just give it some thought and you will see it is actually a safety method.
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
Re: Wikipedia and Homeopathy
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2014 5:17 am
by Lynn Cremona
I'm with you on that 100%
Best,
Lynn
---------------------------
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
--
Imagine Peace
http://www.homeopathicsolutions.blogspot.com/
________________________________
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.