In a message dated 8/30/2013 3:50:12 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
furryboots@icehouse.net writes:
That's right, that's what I just wrote, a molecule has nuclei, not just one nucleus. Nuclei is the plural of nucleus . .
Nuclei is the plural of nucleus. Each atom has a nucleus, so three atoms add up to three nuclei. We're both saying the same damn thing, but you're telling me I'm wrong.
Irene, hydrogen in water becomes radioactive by cosmic bombardment in the upper atmosphere. Look it up.
No, it's not separate from water. Look up tritiated water. Tritiated water is super heavy water, where protium (simple hydrgen) in water becomes tritium, T, or 3H. Please check your "facts" before you start contradicting people with them.
Well tell that to any number of people who are usinjg tritiated water as a medical isotope. Tell it to Rolland Conte who detected it in a homeopathic remedy. Tell it to the people who make nuclear weapons. Why do you think they called it the Hydrogen bomb? It's because they used tritium, tritiated water,i.e. super heavy water, as a detonator.
Tritium is in tritiated water. "Tritiated water is a form of water where the usual hydrogen atoms are replaced with tritium. In its pure form it may be called tritium oxide (T2O or 3H2O) or super-heavy water. Pure T2O is corrosive due to self-radiolysis. Diluted, tritiated water is mainly H2O plus some HTO (3HOH). ..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritiated_water
Well, after reading you confuse "nuclei" with "nucleus" and deny the existence of tritiated water, I'm beginning to think you're just taking exception with conventional terminology to drive everyone nuts. What do you have, a dictionary where you just write in your own definitions for the words? Is this how you're handling your court case?
Radioactive means it emits or relates to the emission of ionizing radiation or particles. It's a form of electromagnetism (EM). It is evident that the homeopathic remedy is resonating throughout the spectrum in that indices have been discovered for both radioactivity and EM.
So is radioactivity . . some call it a wave, some call it a particle, but both radioactivity and electromagnetism are on the same spectrum.
Don't you listen to your radio because it's a radioactive receiver? You're fighting over semantics while you're making up on your own. Show me something other than your own fiction, quote somebody other than Ron Paul.
You're talking about two different spots on the EM spectrum. But where do you think all this radiation is coming from? You seem to think that you can knock it out of the nucleus like a golf ball with a nine iron. But after a million years, what is it you think is knocking "particles" out of the nucleus of all that radioactive material stored in tanks at Hanford up wind from you in Spokane? Arnold Palmer? You seem to think radioactivity comes out of plutonium like music from the energizer bunny. All we have to do is wait for it to run down?
That explains everything . . I mean nothing. Can you point to a spot on the electromagnetic spectrum where you think plain old electromagnetic radiation ends and "radioactive" radiation begins? Just at what frequnecy does radiation become radioactivity.
The point I'm trying to make here, Irene, is that we're awash in indistinct terminolgy. "Radio active" radiation appears to be synonymous in your mind with what you conslder to be solely nuclear radiation, distinct from more common electromagnetic radiation.
But what makes you so sure of the source?
I'm suggesting that the differences are not so distinct between EM and nuclear, and that "radio active".applies to the imagined source, whereas logic suspects it's idiopathic. Other than spectral wavelength, what are the differences between an AM signal and beta waves? Are you going to say that at some point along the spectrum the wave changes into a particle?
We have the same problem with the word "homeopathy." It describes an application of a material, not what the material is, yet it is taken to mean a highly diluted substances. This is why I refer to homeopathic remedies above or approaching Avogadro as supramolecular.
So you think that once you get to ionizing radiation on the spectrum, up there around xray, beta and gamma it becomes a particle?
Please stop playing games, Irene.
Tell that to material scientists at Penn State and Stanford, such as Prof Iris Bell, Prof Rick Hoover and Prof William Tiller, who wrote: 'The most distinctive feature of bonding in liquid water is not only the "well-known hydrogen bonds, but the necessary presence of a wide range” of van der Waals bonds between and among the various oligomeric (cluster) structural units. It is this range of very weak bonds that could account for the remarkable ease of changing the structure of water, which in turn could help explain the half-dozen well-known anomalies in its properties. In its subtler form, such weak bonds would also allow for the changes of structure caused by electric and magnetic fields and by radiation of all kinds, including possibly so-called “subtle energies”, which are the basis of an enormous range of claims about specially “structured” water.'
...
'Water is therefore probably the most easily changed phase of condensed matter known.'
The Structure Of Liquid Water; Novel Insights From Materials Research; Potential Relevance To Homeopathy Materials Research Innovations Online 5 77 Roy R, Tiller W, Hoover R, Bell I
The Cavendish Laboratory is the Department of Physics at the University of Cambridge, part of the University's School of Physical Sciences. It was opened in 1874 as a teaching laboratory. James Maxwell, the developer of electromagnetic theory, is the founder of the lab and was its first professor of physics.
How do you know there isn't? Have you read Conte's account of detecting tritium in a homeopathic remedy in his book "Theory of High Dilutions?"
Where is it that you think this EM from the clathrate is coming from?
I agree, although I don't think contact is needed.
Tell that whopper to researchers who have confirmed Linus Pauling's ionfluence of the co valentsigma bond.on hydrogen bonding.
(Sigh) Radioactivitry is electromagnetism, Irene. Know it. Read up on the Nuclear Electromagnetic pulse. Set off a nuclear weapon and it will generate a huge amount of electromagnetism, enough to fry your hair dryer.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_el ... etic_pulse
It could be that succussion is creating a nanoscale nuclear reaction.
Read Structure of Liquid Water. 'A considerable body of work now demonstrates the effects of magnetic fields on aqueous solutions.'
The possibilities of such a thing are founded on Conte's experiments and the fact that tritium occurs naturally in water.
Please don't be so contradicting without giving me some reference, as I have done for you, or it just gets down to no it isn't vs. yes it is arguing. It's annoying. Its the same as I get from skeptic know it alls who know nothing at all, trolls who insist there's nothing but "plain water" in the H remedy. I'm making a real effor to drawn upon the literature as I hope you will too..