Minutus

Given that Hahnemann was speculating (even if he said that he wasn't) about miasmas and psora and the like, I don't accept his word as the word of God on these matters. I don't have a problem with transcendental causes. And I don't have a problem with speculation. I do have a problem with accepting as an authority someone who was speculating about transcendental causes 200 years ago. Just because Hahnemann was absolutely amazing in most everything else does not mean that I will accept his transcendental speculations without question.

(:->)

Roger Bird
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: ellen.madono@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 03:15:01 +0900
Subject: Re: [Minutus] I need understanding . . .
Hi Soroush,

Are you describing miasm?

The central disturbance is not always miasm. A good remedy does not necessarily go that deep. A good remedy could cure the problem caused by, for example, a pathogen or an emotional event that "broke the camels back," but it does not necessarily cure the fundamental delusion. The tendency to breakdown by stressors may remain, yet the remedy would be declared successful.

Ellen Madono
________________________________

Hi Rogers,

I think of Miasm as concept that can be used in actual practice.

Best,
Ellen
________________________________
________________________________