Page 2 of 2

Re: Local treatments

Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:19 am
by Roger Barr
Its the totality of the _disease_ (mental, physical & emotional) symptoms that are considered for proper acute (and chronic) homeopathic treatment. You wouldnt _necessarily_ consider the miasm, birth trauma, color preferences, hand gestures or other irrelevant cr*p when doing an acute! And yet it would not necessarily be considered local treatment. Local treatment is defined by whether as a result of the treatment new symptoms develop (e.g. side-effects) as opposed to a return of old symptoms (ie. curative response).

Roger

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, tikva wrote:

Re: Local treatments

Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:29 am
by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
That is a new definition of the concept of "local".

As far as I understand, in the field of therapy, it means a treatment that is focused on the place, organ or system that is now presenting with symptoms, without taking into consideration the "irrelevant cr*p" you so elegantly describe... :-)

Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com

Re: Local treatments

Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:10 am
by Roger Barr
Not new unless you consider the Organon to be new, as I read it.

Roger

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD." wrote: