Dear friends,
This is Frederik Schroyens writing, hallo to you! If you are interested in facts, I will give you some.
1 - on Synthesis being "more complete".
Yes, that is a claim we made, based on the facts in 2009, when the Treasure Edition at that time, had more new information (remedies more than Kent) than Complete 2009.
You will not find that graph on our website as we do not believe that competing on quantity benefits the homeopathic cause. However if you wish we can send you the chart.
2 - on a different "quantity"
We firmly believe that quality of information should be the first concern of a repertory editor. Since version 7 (1997), Synthesis comes with source information: remedies in repertory rubrics are directly and visibly linked to the source Materia Medica text. That quantity of information has been increasing rapidly with each successive edition. Several teams are working to make the upcoming Synthesis 2011 even more complete than ever in this sense. We will have thousands of transparent, verifiable additions in the upcoming version. A unique effort of the Synthesis team.
3- still more "quantity"
In addition, there are numerous links to all types of information in Synthesis, which show that we depart from the old concept that the repertory is merely symptoms with remedies.
We have unparallelled language access tools, direct links to websites, dictionaries, to thousands of Multimedia objects, videos, etc. With RadarOpus, Synthesis 2011 will include direct access to hundreds of full texts of contemporary provings.
4- still remedies and symptoms lacking now?
Yes, it is true that the current version of Synthesis (edition 2009) does not contain some of the more recent information. This is a temporary problem as we do have all that more recent information integrated in our source Synthesis already. Because of the major transition from Radar, EH, etc. to one integrated program RadarOpus, we have a delay in releasing that information.
Anybody is welcome to mail us at
synthesis@archibel.com to verify if certain "missing" information has been integrated already or not. In any case, it will be there with the upcoming release of Synthesis 2011.
5- Radar the only one on Mac OS?
Unfortunately, homeopaths like duplication of effort. So there are some dozens of homeopathic software packages out there, on Windows OS, Mac OS, etc. We all know that this is the situation since years.
To say that we are the only homeopathic software on Mac would be ridiculous and in fact never happened. The statement that we did say so is unfounded slandering.
6- Too expensive?
This can only be thought by friends who never did participate in creating the tools our community needs. The amount of work is enormous and far from finished. Still our community is small, so we are offering a vertical software at prices which would expect a very big audience.
Ever since I started with this project, I have seen duplication of effort by the brother in law, the best friend who agrees to program after his hours, most often with the promise to do it all much cheaper if not for free. After many hundreds, sometimes thousands of hours those projects collapse and leave the pioneers staring at their empty pockets.
If homeopaths believe that they are a true profession, we need professionals at all levels, such as the current seven full time programmers at Archibel. If people only knew the efforts made by the true pioneers, doing the original work, such as Roger Van Zandvoort, David Warkentin's team and our team, I am sure they would gladly pay the double.
Thanks for reading me!
Frederik (Schroyens)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- In
minutus@yahoogroups.com, Roger Van Zandvoort wrote: