Minutus

Of course not, but then you're supposing even more if you say either is good! What you need is info from the doctors treating the patient - nothing else will do. Some remedies will stop haemorrhage - some will dissolve clots - some like Arnica will do both.
But you need to know, and if you don't have the information, then at the very least make an educated guess. With HRT, haemorrhage is unlikely, which rules out Kerry's rubric, in fact, could make it positively dangerous.
Liz

You would need proper information with any case that you were dealing
with Liz. Rochelle didn't give absolute specifics; she asked a vague
question and got answers from multiple people that 'might' be
applicable. Of the three people I know of that had strokes, they all
had bad haemorrhaging and one was on HRT. We are back to
individualizing a case again and I am certain that Rochelle is more than
capable of ascertaining what form the stroke took, and will not follow
blindly by using every rubric that is suggested.

Kerry

Read my posts more carefully, Kerry - or perhaps you were replying to Joy, who was happy to use either
Liz

I did read your posts Liz and it was those posts that I was replying to.
I also read Joy's post and I am fully aware that Joy takes a proper case
and considers all options. Other than you trying to snipe at people for
no reason I can't see what your point is.

Kerry

Fine - just read my posts, OK? I said exactly that - you need information from the doctor because to go with a rubric for haemorrhage could be dangerous. I was not advocating ad-hoc prescribing.
So I take it we are in full agreement!
Liz

I read your posts so carefully looking for any homeopathic instruction and I wouldn't consider " with HRT haemorrhage is unlikely' to be of such proper and due instruction. It certainly can be possible and dangerous to assume otherwise.

Joy

http://www.joylucashomeopathy.com
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/homeopathystudy/

Have you had a bad day Liz?

Kerry