i am familiar with infowars site. they are big questioners of the propaganda of the powers that be. so i read this
article in that vein. that being said, much in the article matches with other information coming form numerous
sources. one of those ideas is the bioweaponry nature of this virus: the fact that it is manmade in a laboratory.
one always has to wonder why anyone would be spending so much time and money manufacturing dangerous
viruses. it seems clear to me that since the mainstream institutions put out that there is no way to treat viruses they
put their money into developing toxic new viruses.
a second point in this article that rings true is that antibiotics not only don't work, but make the problem worse.
this forensic scientist is quoted as saying he disapproves of the over-the-counter availability of these antibiotics.
this must be a europen or russian experience. it is not so in the usa. he also seems to trust that patients working
with their doctors will arrive at more reasonable and effective solutions. so he supports the medical model of
disease management.
he does reference, however, the importance of a strong immune system and supports methods that would build
it up.
much of what he says feels like new information about the nature of this new viral form but it may be that we, in the
west, are just beginning to get this information. of course, it is also true, that the disease is generally a new hit on
humanity. it makes sense that forensices in russia, the ukraine, and other eastern european nations would be the
first to arrive at this understanding since it is those countries that are dealing with this disease assault.
in the following article the vaccine in germany contains cancer cells. the elite get vaccinated without the adjuvants,
but the public gets them.
http://info-wars.org/2009/10/17/german- ... gredients/
the intent seems to be clearly nefarious. whether it is to weaken and sicken the public for future profits of the corporations
or for population control issues (i personally think it is a 1-2 punch on us) has been the dialogue among many who are not
co-dependent on the power structure for interpretation of reality. and considering that WHO knowingly continues to appoint
corporate big namers to sit on review panels has to at least raise the question of their motives. WHO is increasingly becoming
the world arbiter of health care protocols and nations are following suit. however, this does not happen without the big guns of
the world dictating what is to be. there are no accidents.
tanya
