Page 2 of 2
Re: Single Simple Remedy (rest of the post!)
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:06 pm
by John Harvey
Soroush, I'll honour that respectful request when I have a moment; but please understand that my position is that Hahnemann knew his own stuff better than Kent and Sheilagh did and do, and that Hahnemann has made his position on this matter so clear that not even you have made any attempt to refute my seven arguments to date elucidating that position.
Cheers --
John
2009/7/23 >
________________________________
Re: Single Simple Remedy (rest of the post!)
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:16 pm
by Vera Resnick
no, it took a few years...
--
------------------------------------
Vera Resnick RCHom
Classical Homeopath
e-mail:
vera.homeopath@gmail.com
Re: Single Simple Remedy (rest of the post!)
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:25 pm
by John Harvey
Very nice explanation, Chris, and probably easier for some to understand than mine.
Thanks!
John
2009/7/28 Christine Gillen >
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing is so fatal to the progress of the human mind as to suppose that our views of science are ultimate; that there are no mysteries in nature; that our triumphs are complete; and that there are no new worlds to conquer."
— Sir Humphry Davy, in "An Account of some Galvanic Combinations", Philosophical Transactions 91 (1801), pp. 397–402 (as quoted by David Knight, Humphry Davy: Science and Power, Cambridge, 1998, p. 87)