Page 2 of 2

Re: Breach (typo corrected!!)

Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 2:02 am
by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Thanks, will do.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
Visit www.drjoesnaturalmedicine.blogspot.com for articles and information.

Re: Breach (typo corrected!!)

Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 4:18 am
by Luise Kunkle
HiJROZ,
Yes, I will.

Give me rain check though - I have xerox copy of it - copied from a
book from the library - the book is out of print - and I have to hunt
for it.

I am sure I won't forget - but at my age one never knows. So if you
have not got it within a month do remind me!

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Re: Breach (typo corrected!!)

Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 3:01 am
by Liz Walton
Hi Irene, I'm asking you on the list because I'm having difficulty accessing your web page and signing in, so I hope you don't mind.
I'm looking after 2 little boy kittens about 10 - 11 weeks old, who were abandoned in a drain and rescued by a friend. One has an umbilical hernia which is quite prominent. Does he need an operation or is there a hx rx that will fix it?
Also, at what age should they be 'fixed'?
Thanks, Liz
________________________________

Re: Breach (typo corrected!!)

Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 1:17 pm
by John Harvey
Interesting; thank you, Luise...

John
2009/5/4 Luise Kunkle >

Re: Breach (typo corrected!!)

Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 1:27 pm
by John Harvey
Hi, Irene --

Thank you for all that detail; very interesting. Effectively, then, Caullophyllum seems to be capable of meeting a broad range of common problems of delivery (in cats) even in advance. It would be useful and interesting, of course, to know more about what it causes in the healthy. Perhaps the famous remedy is merely acting allopathically, setting up an involuntary exercise regime that ultimately benefits, in most cases at least, the progress of the labour -- which I take to be the thrust of your "OTHER" theory.

Naturally you won't want to withhold what seems clearly to be needed. Of course, the classic ethical reluctance to withhold what seems to be needed clinically is, of course, another reason to study its effects more directly, via a pathogenetic trial, rather than to infer them, rightly or wrongly, from a clinical one. But pathogenetic trials involving humans are going to be our best sources of such information.

Thanks again for your trouble. And your own delivery should prove something of an inspiration for those reluctant to exercise! Cheers --

John
2009/5/4 Irene de Villiers >

Re: Breach (typo corrected!!)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 1:01 am
by Irene de Villiers
Perhaps yes, though I do give high credence to clinically shown
efficacy and not only to proving sx.
My pleasure:-)
I was just having fun - and too stubborn to listen to those who said
one must take it easy during later months.
I think that having fun is the key to any exercise program.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."