I wonder how much you have thought this through.
If someone gets their leg blown off in a war zone, are they useless at nutrition advice just becasue their leg seems incurable by failing to regenerate. Or do you think it is healthy to be minus a leg.
Do you really think anyone can be totally objective about their own situation? So as to heal themsleves? There is a belief, for good reasons, that a homepath who is their own homeopath, has a fool for a homeopath.
If you want your nutrition advisor to be fully healthy, those kinds of tings are considerations.
What is it about a person that disqualifies them from being able to give good advice on one topic while not having perfect progress in another area?
Yet you require perfect health for someone to have expert knowledge in thde separate subject of nutrition.
Or do you assume good nutrition can fix anything?
I do not think you have applied logic or common sense.
Nor do I think the 100% healthy individual even exists.
However, if they did exist, there would be no reason to think they know everything about nutrition - or they may know a lot about it but lack the skills to apply it to someon ewho is different from themsleves.
So I think you have not thought this through. It looks like a lazy knee-jerk idea rather than one designed from true objectives of wanting to learn the most valid principles about nutrition from the best provider of same
I for one am not 100% healthy either.
Does that mean that what I know about nutrition is somehow invalid?
Somehow what I know about the way know individuals work, is somehow negated in all the research I have studied, becasue I personally have less then perfect health?
I think not.
We have a huge volume of nutrition research available to us. Different members of this forum know more or less about it but their own health does not affect what knowledge they have, or what skills they have at describing the knowledge.
Your shortcut of looking for someone in perfect health, is not an answer to getting good nutrition advice.
You will need to be less lazy and more actively involved in judging the information you see/hear, than that:-)
Namaste,
Irene
PS It IS possible to regenerate parts that are traumatically lost.
It worked for a cat I had, who regenerated his ears, at a rate of about quarter inch per week for the full 2.5 inches.
I just wish I knew how to repeat it:-)
All I have as a memory is the vet's face when he realized he was not dreaming what he was seeing:-)
So MAYBE nothing's impossible in the healing game, but nobody yet knows it all!
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.Furryboots.info
(Info on Feline health, genetics, nutrition & homeopathy)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."